• Miss Sunset (3-1) grinds out the win over Chalon in the Grade 2 Raven Run Stakes.Posted 2 days ago
  • Bonus Points (3-1) swings wide and draws clear to win the Maryland Million Classic.Posted 2 days ago
  • La Coronel (5-1) leads them all the way in the Grade 1 Queen Elizabeth II Challenge Cup.Posted 9 days ago
  • Rubilinda (6-5) finds the wire just in time to take the Pebbles Stakes.Posted 9 days ago
  • Engage (1-2) rolls home from last to win the Grade 3 Futurity Stakes.Posted 9 days ago
  • Bolt d'Oro is the 12-1 favorite in the current Las Vegas line for Kentucky Derby 2018.Posted 12 days ago
  • Romantic Vision (6-1) takes the sloppy Spinster (G1) at Keeneland.Posted 15 days ago
  • Unique Bella (1-5) returns with a clear victory in the L. A. Woman (G3) at Santa Anita.Posted 15 days ago
  • Flameaway (5-1) wins a three-horse photo finish in the Dixiana Bourbon (G3) at a wet Keeneland.Posted 15 days ago
  • War Flag (9-1) wins the stretch battle in Belmont's Flower Bowl (G1).Posted 15 days ago
Breeders' Cup 2017

HRN Original Blog:
Zipse At The Track

A different kind of Trip Handicapping

The following is a guest blog, written by Michael Tartaglia. Known as mjtags11 on HRN, Michael was the skillful winner of the Breeders' Cup Survivor Challenge last fall on ZATT.

A few months ago I got Andrew Beyer's The Winning Horseplayer.  By the time I was headed to Aqueduct on the 29th of December, I read through a few chapters, learning about track biases, something I am still a little skeptical about, and trip handicapping.  I used trip handicapping for stakes races before, like the Triple Crown, and have brought me success.  However, after attempting it at Aqueduct, I started 0 for 5.  Yikes!  This rarely happens to me.  So, I scrap my notes and rely on the basics, Past Performances from the track program (I do not use the Daily Racing Form for that, although I do use it sometimes).  Next up was the sixth race.  I narrowed down the race to the 2 horse Empress of Gold and the 8 horse My Dreamy Mimi.  Then, I wanted to only place a bet on one horse, so I look at speed, an old trick.  But not the Beyer or Equibase speed figures, but the times and lengths back on the Past Performances.  As the old saying goes, "Speed matters, not class."  I go to the window to place my bet.  Number 2, Empress of Gold, $10 across the board.  Once the race went off, I was standing in a box in the grandstand.  She was far back on the backstretch and just starting to make a move on the far turn. Junior Alvarado could not win with her at the way she was running and the unusual pace.  But he did it.  Empress of Gold won at the wire. My luck turned around.  The 7th race was a bust.  But the 8th race was the Swirlaway Stakes, my specialty.  After handicapping the race for a few days, using a combination of Trip Handicapping (my way) and my stakes formula, I chose the 3 horse Proud and Charming.  At the track, I looked over the Past Performances, trying to find a good trifecta. Had to go with the 1-2-3.  Once the race went off, Proud and Charming was 14 lengths back.  At the end of the far turn, Proud and Charming was sprinting! He passed almost everyone, just barely losing. Finished in second, and the final result was 2-3-1.  I won the place and show bets on Proud and Charming, along with the $2 trifecta which paid $110.  The last race finished off with a second, with Just Hold On unable to hold on in the end.

So after the last race, I wondered, is the traditional form of Trip Handicapping dead?  My form of trip handicapping is making observation about a horse’s attitude and general statements about the horse.  The traditional way is to analyze a race and find reasons for or against a good or bad performance.  Now old method has been around since the late seventies, early eighties.  However, how could a method go five races without even getting a horse to land in the money.  Of course it could just be my fault, but this is just odd.  Could a thirty plus year old method no longer be effective?  It is a question that I have asked myself since that day.  At least speed handicapping seems to work.  Now I do not have enough information to make a conclusion about the question, but my hypothesis is: If a handicapper uses traditional trip handicapping over speed handicapping, they will not hit the board as often. Now there's a question! 


comments powered by Disqus

Older Comments about A different kind of Trip Handicapping...

I have no interest in reading anything written about thoroughbred horse racing written by someone who rated Secretariat a 3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
People over analyze trips giving far too much to a horse that got a little side tracked next out.
Congrats once again, Michael ... thanks for the contribution on HRN!

Related Pages

      Connect With Brian

Me On Facebook
Follow Me On Twitter


 ZATT's Star of the Week 


Meet Brian Zipse 

Brian has been a passionate fan of horse racing his entire life. Taken to the races at a very young age, he has been lucky enough to see all the greats in person from Secretariat, Forego, and Ruffian through Rachel Alexandra, Zenyatta, and American Pharoah. Before coming to the Nation, Brian displayed his love for the sport through the development of his horse racing website, which quickly became one of the most popular blogs in the game. 

The Editor of Horse Racing Nation from 2010-2017, Brian authored a daily column as Zipse at the Track, or ZATT for short, and added his editorial flare to the overall content of the website. Now a Senior Writer for HRN, Brian continues to contribute his thoughts on racing, as well as co-hosting the popular racing show, HorseCenter. A big supporter of thoroughbred aftercare, he serves as the President of The Exceller Fund.

Brian's work has also been published on several leading industry sites. He has consulted for leading contest site Derby Wars, is both a Hall of Fame and NTRA poll voter, and is a Vox Populi committee member. 

A horse owner and graduate of DePaul University, Brian lives just outside of Louisville with his wife Candice and daughter Kendra.


Top Stories