No. Endless BS without counterarguments mean NOTHING, and is all empty head individuals like
yourself are capable of.
"Again, a lot will depend on how the race unfolds,
and the Classic is by no means a lock for Chrome
or any other horse."
Reading comprehension should be a priority on
your list of things to do.
The point is that the person who posted that was incorrect.
Way too much for you to grasp. Even the simple ones need to be dumbed down. Stick to politics.
Seems like someone left the lid up again. Crawl back into your political S Hole where comments like these belong. This is not for you and I won't tie up this page with your s**t.
Sorry. This is way too much to dumb down. But if you think there is something wrong here, check your own comments for any references to prior statistics and tell me their proposed meaning.
Like what Chrome's 1:09 going 1 1/8th and geared down finish means. You'll have an even better LOL!...
Sure sounded like you both were. What does 1:09 going 9F at SA or how fast he came home in that race have to do with going 10F? Would be clearer if you would actually post a reply to the person that made the comment.
Take Baffert's word that he was blowing harder to get down to the winner's circle than Arrogate came back after the race, and Garcia's word that he could run all day. Whether he was being asked or not is irrelevant.
Sillier than comparing 1 1/8th splits to a 1 1/4 race?
Aren't you the smart one.
Yes, standing at stud here was a consolation thought, I guess you could call it. But I felt more that they were slipping in under the radar with a horse they thought had a real shot. But simple answers are always the likeliest.
Then again...this IS the racing game!...
I've never seen it.
I was intrigued last year and felt they MUST have had a good reason for sending Gleneagles. I was sure of it. But now I am sure that the reason must have been the same
as this year's - "Why the hell not"!...
Copyright © 2010 -
other passionate horse racing fans!