Why would she have any rating at all?
What a runner! In the money in 44 of 50 starts! And in the money in 34 of 38 in the USA, all stakes! That 88% in the money stat is unreal after that many starts.
Cougar II fans need to vote for him, there's someone who is rather uneducated about racing and doesn't comprehend that this was a phenomenal horse and is ranking him down all the time. It's ridiculous. Vote him up!
For Cougar II to make 50 career starts and have 40 of them be stakes placings is an excellent statistic. That's 80% of his starts! Then you have the 88% in the money when you consider all races. And for those statistics to be better than all those horses listed above, in the initial post of the thread by mikesek, surely must have some meaning. I think it means he belongs on the list of greats, and that he surely ranks ahead most of them listed...maybe all of them. After all, his 88% career, in the money percentage, beats all those horses, and he ran at the top level of the game too. He and Forego, for example, out of all those horses listed, are at 88%! Sometimes you just have to let the facts stand...they are what they are.
At least I'm happy that you agree that The Big Cat was fabulous. He was a tiger!
Here's another great, phenomenal runner who keeps getting worse scores all the time. Absurd.
It's amazing how you people keep ranking great horses down, down, down all the time.
Another one who is nowhere near being in the Top 100, but a nice horse.
This is definitely not a Top 100 horse. Maybe around #250 or so is more accurate.
A month ago this fabulous horse was at 8.50 and now he's at 8.32. Looks like someone has a vendetta, or they just don't know anything about horse racing. He was in the money 44 times from 50 starts, had 40 stakes wins and placings. The horse is great. Knock it off already.