Let me rephase, not far more challenging just a lot of money, still can't believe a three year old however is the highest ranking..
The breeders cup race is far more challenging than a triple crown. I'd like to see American Pharoah run it actually. He only won 4 million in earnings. If you were to win the breeders cup classic it would be 5 million. But anyways Breeders Classic does allow horses older than 3 years old, if he were to run it itd sure be a true test for a champion.
I'm not saying this because I'm not a big fan of Baffert, it's just that even though he did win the triple crown, his times in the Kentucky Derby and the Preakness stakes were of some of the slowest times. It did pay off in the Belmont though as he was faster than the average time. I guess time doesn't really matter though in the end, as he won all three. The survey "Greatest horse since the 1970's champions" I'm sorry but I strongly disagree with the many who had said yes. Zenyatta, Barbaro, Rachael Alexandra, and many more. Have had greater wins than the American Pharaoh.
I miss seeing the yellow shirt with a brown dot up on the 3 year old leader board.
There is no more now, people these days breed the old with the old. Have you heard about the A.P. Indy foals? People love them but I think they are gonna all burn out soon, A p indy was old when he breed with their dams.
I would like him if people would stop saying he is the next "super horse".
... I don't give a crud anymore. I'm just gonna wait till next year to start making discussion. Right now I'm keeping my opinions to myself.
I know I am not "Magical"... oh and also if I would of had said something good about a 2 year old people would say "it's too early to tell" "This horse is NOT good". If I would say something bad, then all of this junk happens. I'm just thinking of logging off and never logging back on because some people are that picky. I would only come back to look at the horses recent races and maybe even join another "nice" website that does not have any of these kinds of fights on it. Would I like to start making early opinions on these horses? Yes, they are full of many races in them, some horses burn out when they reach 3 year olds. I would like to just focus on these, I'm not thinkg about the triple crown like anyone else I'm think about more of the good 2 year old races. But even if I say anything about the BCV everyone will fight, they wil say things like all of you are "You're not that magical", "I think you just received a lesson", and "This horse is not good enough what are you talking about". I know a lot about horse racing. even though I don't own one. I did not learn too much on this website, all I learned is that some people think that they choose the best horses only to see then be passed up by another horse half way into the home. Even the news press gets happy with these 2 year olds, they thought Affirmed was going to be the next TC and he is not on the front page any more. Brown Almighty ran his first race 1 mile long on turf and then he ran another race and won then got 2nd in two other races. He is not on the top, Know more is. A colt who only race 3 races and lost 2 of them. 2nd place is not 2nd place he lost.
Tim, I think you should keep you're rude messages to yourself. You think that the horses that you pick out are the GREATEST ON EARTH! This is not a few years ago this is 2012. Those are just the bad horses, look at the good ones. Way more... they may not have won the triple crown but they sure are good,
p.s. I am just throwing out information, it's not a war...
Copyright © 2010 -
other passionate horse racing fans!