i took the leaders i know people like closers in the belmont, but i go the other way. ruler on ice and stay thirsty were both very close to shackleford that race. i bet wins on shackleford, stay thirsty and ruler on ice. got my money back on shackleford flating out and ended up a head. great race and it seems to always be someone upseting the belmont many times. congrats to those who had the tri or super! my problem is i just bet straight money usually win or across the board.
he also had some pressure, from stay thirtsy and ruler on ice. they all put up a great race.
guess i should have had the exacta beting win on stay thristy, ruler on ice and shackleford. i didn't think closer would hit the board.
more like good studying than easy. easy would be just bet the mudders. still good win. there was one guy who had the super and tri at the track today. i had 15 to win on ruler. it was silent at fonner after that race. i bet it was silent many places expct for the few who got it.
and it was muddy.
by the way i didn't have the tri just the win on ruler as a back up if shackleford folds.
i bet win on all the front runners. that tri is easy if you just are picking numbers i guess. ruler on ice looked good in the slop my only reason for risking it. and i thoguht him shackleford and stay thirsty would shoot for the lead. if those two were right then shackleford wouldn't be the only speed.
his mud rating was bad. had to go with the mudder and the front runners. he put in a great effort and just didn't have it.
Copyright © 2010 -
other passionate horse racing fans!