Pimlico Race Course

10 Reasons why Rachel should be Horse of the Year (by Brian Zipse)

1) Geography - In many years, where a horse raced does not matter, but when there is such an interesting race as this, it needs to be taken into consideration. We are after all, looking for our National Champion. Zenyatta raced all of her races in the friendly confines of Southern California, meanwhile, Rachel Alexandra raced in six different states and at seven different tracks during 2009.
Advantage : Rachel Alexandra

2) Beyer Ratings - Like them or not, they are the best tool in American racing to place a quantitative standard as to how well a horse performed in a certain race. Zenyatta’s Beyers from this year are 103, 104, 99, 97, and 112. Rachel Alexandra’s Beyers are 100, 103, 101, 108, 108, 111, 116, and 109. Her average Beyer rating in the last five races (all Grade 1’s) is 110.4, which is higher than every Beyer rating than Zenyatta has ever run until her last race.
Advantage : Rachel Alexandra

3) Grade 1’s - A sheer numbers comparison: Zenyatta won four Grade 1 races in 2009, while Rachel Alexandra won five Grade 1 races this year.
Advantage : Rachel Alexandra

4) Overcoming Adversity - While many races tactically set up well for the two heroines, there were three races that notably did not. Rachel Alexandra overcame a 13 post and a speed dual (something never done in my lifetime) to win an American classic, the Preakness, by one length. She overcame a rabbit, and a fresh wave of challengers every step of the way to beat older males and win the Woodward by a head over Macho Again. In the Clement Hirsch Stakes, Zenyatta was too far behind a dawdling early pace and still managed to get up and win by a head. Her head victory was over a horse named Anabaa’s Creation.
Advantage : Rachel Alexandra

5) Total Races - Both horses were undefeated and raced exclusively in stakes races, so I will side with the horse that ran eight times compared to the horse who only ran five times.
Advantage : Rachel Alexandra

6) Versatility - Rachel Alexandra raced on seven different dirt surfaces (every track is a little different) and raced equally well on both dry and wet surfaces throughout the year. Zenyatta only raced on fast Pro-Ride surfaces and was scratched out of the Louisville Distaff due to an earlier rain. By race time the track was listed as good.
Advantage : Rachel Alexandra

7) Margins of Victory - Rachel Alexandra’s average margin of victory in her eight races this year, all stakes wins, was more than 8 lengths, including a 6 length win over our soon to be champion 3-year-old colt, Summer Bird. In many of these victories, she was being eased up before the wire. Zenyatta’s average margin of victory in her five races, all stakes wins, was just over 1 ¼ lengths.
Advantage : Rachel Alexandra

8) Horses Beaten - While it is true that both fantastic horses have beaten many top horses, especially in the BC Classic, Preakness, Haskell, and Woodward, one has beaten far more stakes winners, graded stakes winners and Grade 1 winners than the other one this year.
Advantage : Rachel Alexandra

9) Aggressiveness of Campaign - Zenyatta gained leaps and bounds when she became the first female ever to win the BC Classic in 26 runnings, but combined with her four relatively easy races prior, she falls short of the campaign waged by Rachel Alexandra, who ran against the boys on three different occasions. She became the first female ever to win the Woodward, the first female winner in 85 years of the Preakness, and only the second filly ever to win the Haskell.
Advantage : Rachel Alexandra

10) Quality Victories - Zenyatta has the biggest win of all, the Breeders’ Cup Classic, but that one race does not trump all the prestigious victories that Rachel Alexandra racked up this year. The Kentucky Oaks, Preakness, Haskell, and Woodward are four of the most important races on the U.S. racing schedule. In elite races on the American landscape the sco

What a huge mess this industry is in. If the major tracks like Churchill and Hollywood can't make a 5-day week work, then we've just contracted our business by 20%. This is serious. Remember, that every track is also an OTB. So this means that every track, OTB, ADW, whatever... will lose simulcasting business. It shows that this industry is all tied together.

Slots and marginal racing states are doing nothing but hurting racing. Slots tracks like Presque Isle and Indiana Downs, that don't need to exist, are doing much more damage than good. And that's not to say that Charles Town and Prairie Meadows need to exist either. All this is serving to do is damage once solid racing centers of Maryland, Kentucky, Ohio and other states.

Those that have whined for slots in MD, KY and OH are nothing but greedy tracks and horsemen that want slots, too... but now it is all coming to fruition.

If Zayat kept Rachel out the Preakness... that would be awesome, hilarious and despicable at the same time.

It would be awesome because the guy's got so many horses he can do what he wants and 'corner the market' because that's how the rules are set up. Hilarious, because the tracks are so freakin lame that they haven't set up better rules. They've had warnings like this before and failed to act. Especially the cowards at CD. They know the rules are broken, but they hide behind the fact that "it's always been that way". If they change the rules and add subjectivity, then they are open to scrutiny, second-guessing and even lawsuits from jerks. But they'd rather take the safe route.

And despicable... well, that's fairly obvious.

Ha!

What would be even funnier... is if Zayat shut out Rachel and a couple others... and then Pioneer lost to a 10-horse field. Even better if the bird drops on him again... with Borel up. That would be great.