One Entry or Multiple Entries?

2/10/2011 5:04 PM
I'm a fan
My Favorite
Most contests allow an individual to play more than one entry.  The cost of the entry determines how many entries you can play depending on your budget.  I have played more than one entry on many occasions.  If you play more than one entry then you think you have a better chance of winning since you can play more longshot horses.  People who oppose more than one entry say its unfair.  Opponents say if the contest is a true indication of handicapping ability then every person should have the same number of entries.  They believe it gives the people with a bigger bankroll a better chance of winning.  Its technically true but if the total number of entries is very large then the advantage is minimal.  Its hard to argue against the people that say everyone should have the same number of entries which gives everyone the exact same chance of winning.  The NTRA/DRF National Handicapping Championship allows one entry while the second biggest tournament, the Coast Casinos Horseplayer World Series, allows multiple entries.  A majority of tournaments allow more than one entry.  Some people outside the die hard tournament players are turned off by this notion of the same people “buying” their way to success.  Right now it is up to the contest directors to make their own rules

I can tell you from my own contest experience that if I play three entries than one of those entries goes down the drain rather quickly which leaves me with two chances.  If I play two entries then very rarely do both entries end up close to equal.  In essence, I have doubled or tripled my investment in a contest for that one live chance.  Another big problem with playing more than one entry is that you have to make decisions on what horses to put on what ticket.  These decisions seem easy but they can mess with your mind.  I have wished on many occasions that I played just one entry.  Why?  Well, if you play only one entry then every horse you play is your top selection.  No stabbing for a huge longshot for the simple reason it’s a big field and the horse is 20/1.  I am not saying that stabbing doesn’t occur late in contests but generally when you play one entry you play your top selection dependent on the parameters of the contest.

What do you think?  Do you want contest directors to limit everyone to one entry or do you like having the opportunity of playing more than one entry?

 

What the Nation is saying about One Entry or Multiple Entries?...

I play in many tournaments with multiple entries and often take the maximum allowed. I have done better in contests with all mandatory races as I make all of my selections prior to the first contest race and only make changes if I need to “stab” or if I am in the lead and can change to a horse I believe will win (regardless to the odds) to protect that lead. I have no problem with people taking multiple entries as it makes the prize pool larger. Does it give one an advantage? Yes and no. In a contest with all mandatory races a multiple entry player has a huge advantage if they hit a "cap" horse or one or two double digit horses on all/most of their tickets. In a contest with both mandatory and optional plays there is a definite advantage in the mandatory races and the player can choose two double digit horses in some of the optional races. In races with all optional races my thinking is the advantage is lessened as chaos can ensue as one decides what horses to put on what ticket. I witnessed the latter at the recent Horse Player World Series. I had one entry but a few of my friends had 2 or more entries and it got a little confusing at times. Only one person in the top 10 had more than one entry, James Benes. Here is a list of 16 people/families from the HPWS last weekend with more than 2 entries along with their highest finish. James Benes – 5 (10th), Robert Bertolucci – 5 (43rd), Craig Kaufman – 5 (191), Hinson Family – 5 (252), Dave Gutfreund – 4 (46th), Paul Shurman – 4 (102nd), Joe Corvi – 4 (103rd), Gwyn Houston – 3 (67th), Tom Blosser – 3 (216th), Scott Eyraud – 3 (292nd), Bonhoff Family – 4 (76th), Christopher Larmey – 3 (362), Steve Herres – 3 (270th), Dan Kaplan – 3 (183rd) Paul Caltagirone – 3 (321st), George Smith – 3 (491st) and Carm Adamino – 3 (572nd). Only 3 in this group received top 60 prize money: James Benes ($6,590), Dave Gutfreund ($988.50) and Robert Bertolucci ($988.50). James Benes also received $790.80 in daily prize money on day 2. I hope to qualify multiple times for 2012 as I would like to play 4 entries.
I don't play a ton of tournaments, so I'm no expert, but like you said - playing with multiple entries can mess with your head. It seems like every time I have tried multiple entries, I end up with a different 20-1 on each entry, and ultimately two mediocre entries.