Ticker
  • Belvoir Bay (7-1) takes them all the way in the Torrey Pines.Posted 1 day ago
  • Strike Charmer (27-1) runs by Lady Eli late in the Ballston Spa.Posted 3 days ago
  • Masochistic (1-5) sprints to an easy victory in the Pat O'Brien at Del Mar.Posted 3 days ago
  • Arrogate (11-1) wins the Travers for fun in stakes record time!Posted 3 days ago
  • Flintshire (1-5) rolls up the rail to win the Grade 1 Sword Dancer.Posted 3 days ago
  • A.P. Indian (1-1) easily wins the Grade 1 Forego in stakes record time of 1:20.99.Posted 3 days ago
  • Drefong (3-1) dominates the Grade 1 King's Bishop every step of the way.Posted 3 days ago
  • Haveyougoneaway (10-1) gets there with a strong late in the Grade 1 Ballerina.Posted 3 days ago
  • Cavorting (2-1) rolls late to get up in the Grade 1 Personal Ensign.Posted 3 days ago
  • Hit It Once More makes every pole a winning one in the Albany Stakes.Posted 4 days ago

Churchill Downs Files Lawsuit in Texas

Recent action by the Texas Racing Commission to enforce its ban on Internet and telephone wagering has resulted in a lawsuit filed by Churchill Downs Inc. and TwinSpires.com.

In the suit, filed Sept. 21 in U.S. District Court in Austin, Texas against members of the Texas Racing Commission and its executive director, Churchill Downs contends the legislation allowing only wagers permitted are those made in person at a live or simulcast facility is unconstitutional. And to support its argument, Churchill notes that the Texas commission has declined to enforce its own ban on Internet and telephone wagering, thus allowing Texans to carry out such activity since the early 1990s.

"Since the 1986 enactment of the Texas Racing Act, Texas law has required any Texan wishing to wager on a horse race to do so in person," Churchill's suit states. "But tellingly, the in-person requirement has gone unenforced. Texans have placed wagers via telephone or the Internet on out-of-state races since the 1990s-and the Racing Commission has allowed them to do so. State officials do not ordinarily shirk their duty to reinforce state law. But they also have a higher duty: 'Of the legislative act is a contravention of the Constitution the office shall obey the Constitution.'


  Read More

 

comments powered by Disqus

Top Stories