Ticker
  • Minding rolls home an easy winner of the Group 1 Pretty Polly Stakes at The Curragh.Posted 2 days ago
  • Melatonin powers home a strong winner of the Gold Cup at Santa Anita.Posted 3 days ago
  • Lord Nelson lunges late to nip Subtle Indian in the Triple Bend.Posted 3 days ago
  • By the Moon proves best in the Grade 3 Bed O' Roses at Belmont Park.Posted 3 days ago
  • Mo Tom finds a trouble free trip, and rolls home an easy Ohio Derby winner.Posted 3 days ago
  • Isabella Sings strolls to victory in Monmouth's Eatontown.Posted 3 days ago
  • Sarah Sis makes all the running as the Chicago Handicap favorite.Posted 3 days ago
  • Harzand holds off Idaho in the Irish Derby to become a dual Derby winnerPosted 3 days ago
  • Far From Over wins his return today at Belmont after more than 16 months away.Posted 4 days ago
  • Champion Untapable has been retired from racing, according to owner, Ron Winchell.Posted 9 days ago

Churchill Downs Files Lawsuit in Texas

Recent action by the Texas Racing Commission to enforce its ban on Internet and telephone wagering has resulted in a lawsuit filed by Churchill Downs Inc. and TwinSpires.com.

In the suit, filed Sept. 21 in U.S. District Court in Austin, Texas against members of the Texas Racing Commission and its executive director, Churchill Downs contends the legislation allowing only wagers permitted are those made in person at a live or simulcast facility is unconstitutional. And to support its argument, Churchill notes that the Texas commission has declined to enforce its own ban on Internet and telephone wagering, thus allowing Texans to carry out such activity since the early 1990s.

"Since the 1986 enactment of the Texas Racing Act, Texas law has required any Texan wishing to wager on a horse race to do so in person," Churchill's suit states. "But tellingly, the in-person requirement has gone unenforced. Texans have placed wagers via telephone or the Internet on out-of-state races since the 1990s-and the Racing Commission has allowed them to do so. State officials do not ordinarily shirk their duty to reinforce state law. But they also have a higher duty: 'Of the legislative act is a contravention of the Constitution the office shall obey the Constitution.'


  Read More

 

comments powered by Disqus

Top Stories