Ticker
  • Highland Reel wins another big one, this time in the Prince of Wales's at Royal Ascot.Posted 2 days ago
  • Highland Reel (2-1) powers to victory in the Prince of Wales's Stakes (G1) at Royal AscotPosted 2 days ago
  • Lady Aurelia (2-1) easily wins at Royal Ascot again in the King's Stand (G1).Posted 3 days ago
  • Timeline (1-10) cruises in Monmouth's Pegasus Stakes to remain perfect..Posted 5 days ago
  • Sweeping Paddy (7-2) pounces and scores in the Regret Stakes.Posted 5 days ago
  • Gun Runner (1-2) romps home much the best in the Grade 1 Stephen Foster.Posted 5 days ago
  • Forever Unbridled (1-1) way too much for her Fleur de Lis foes.Posted 5 days ago
  • Kasaqui (3-1) rolls down the lane to victory in the Wise Dan.Posted 5 days ago
  • Faypien (7-2) edges Mopotism in the Grade 2 Summertime Oaks.Posted 6 days ago
  • McCraken (1-5) rolls to a facile score in the Matt Winn.Posted 6 days ago
Breeders Cup 2015
Royal Ascot 2017

Churchill Downs Files Lawsuit in Texas

Recent action by the Texas Racing Commission to enforce its ban on Internet and telephone wagering has resulted in a lawsuit filed by Churchill Downs Inc. and TwinSpires.com.

In the suit, filed Sept. 21 in U.S. District Court in Austin, Texas against members of the Texas Racing Commission and its executive director, Churchill Downs contends the legislation allowing only wagers permitted are those made in person at a live or simulcast facility is unconstitutional. And to support its argument, Churchill notes that the Texas commission has declined to enforce its own ban on Internet and telephone wagering, thus allowing Texans to carry out such activity since the early 1990s.

"Since the 1986 enactment of the Texas Racing Act, Texas law has required any Texan wishing to wager on a horse race to do so in person," Churchill's suit states. "But tellingly, the in-person requirement has gone unenforced. Texans have placed wagers via telephone or the Internet on out-of-state races since the 1990s-and the Racing Commission has allowed them to do so. State officials do not ordinarily shirk their duty to reinforce state law. But they also have a higher duty: 'Of the legislative act is a contravention of the Constitution the office shall obey the Constitution.'


  Read More

 

comments powered by Disqus

Top Stories