Login
|
Join for Free
Login
Facebook User?
Login to HRN
with your Facebook account.
Use your HRN account:
User Name:
Password:
Forgot Your Password?
Already have an HRN account but want to login with Facebook?
Link your accounts
.
Loading…
Home
BC
- HRN 2011 Breeders' Cup Tickets
2011 Breeders' Cup
- Breeders' Cup Tickets in HRN section
- BC Preps Replay Wall
- Wagering Menu & Guarantees
- Breeders' Cup TV Schedule
- BC Pedigree Analysis
Breeders' Cup History
Kentucky Derby 2012
Kentucky Derby History
2012 Kentucky Derby
- Derby Contenders
- Interactive Derby Trail
- Derby Trail Replay Wall
- Pedigree Analysis
- Tickets
- Workout Reports
- TV Schedule
- Post Time & Wagering Menu
- KY Derby Split Times
PREAKNESS Stakes
BELMONT Stakes
Kentucky Oaks
Triple Crown - Winners & Misses
Stakes Tracker
Race Of The Week
Top 250
Active horses
All-time horses
All-Time Females
2012 Derby Contenders
2012 Oaks Contenders
Browse All Horses
Blogroll
HRN Exclusive Blogs
- Zipse at the Track
- Across The Pond
- Around the Oval with Melaina Phipps
- Bay Area Backstretch
- Behind the Scenes at the Kentucky Derby
- Chicago Dark Horse
- Dead Heat Debates
- Derby Wars
- Drive On (Harness)
- Exchange Wagering 101
- Eye On Saratoga
- 55,000 Furlongs to the Finish
- Florida Filly
- Handicapper's Corner
- Hoosier State Of Mind
- HRN - The Nation Blog
- Kentucky Derby Super Screener
- Kentucky Oaks Runner
- New Mexico
- New York State Of Racing
- Race Talk with the Girl Next Door
- Racing at the Jersey Shore
- This Date in History
- Thoroughly Woodbine
- Trackside with Trackman
- 12th Crown
- View From The Bluegrass
Handicapping
Plays of the Day
Handicapping Contests
Online Wagering (ADW)
Fantasy Horse Racing - Stars Of Racing.com
Tools
- Selections/Picks
- Products/PP's
- FREE white papers
- Pedigree Analysis
- How to Handicap
Pick 6 Blog
Pick 4 blog
News
News - by category
- Blogs
- Jockeys
- Owners
- Tracks
- Trainers
- Breeding
- Industry News
- Wagering News
Video
Graded Stakes Replays
HRN on Youtube
Radio
Shop
2012 Kentucky Derby Shop
Horse Racing Nation gear
Uncle Mo
Breeders' Cup
HRN Art Store
Data
Add to the Wiki
Adding Race Results - video
Horses
People
Tracks
Stakes
Companies/Organizations
About
About HRN
Site Tour (video)
Adding Race Results (video)
Add to the Wiki
FAQ
Advertise with HRN
Help Wanted
Meet the Team
Contact Us
Ride
Man O' War
against other champions!
Man O' War
1917 - Horse
|
Deceased
21
fans
21
63
favorites
63
[Edit]
Loading…
Owner(s):
Samuel Riddle
 -Â
Trainer:
Louis Feustel
Bred:
Kentucky (USA)
by
August Belmont Ii
 -Â
[Add Data]
Pedigree:
Fair Play
-
Mahubah
by
Rock Sand
Rating:
9.32/10
My Rating:
No rating
(
delete
)
Login
to
rate this horse.
Profile
Pedigree
Progeny
Siblings
Biography
News & Notes
Photos
What the Horse Racing Nation is saying about Man O' War...
Post comment to my Facebook profile
Man O' War
Absurd. Man O' War is not the best horse of all time, but he is one of the greats. It's not like we're arguing about the Bible, we're just putting a horse in his proper historical perspective. It's not so bad, or sinful, to say he is toward the bottom of the top 10.
Posted by
jackie999
·
21 days ago ·
like
1
1
·
Comment
Show All 88 Comments
cocoa2
·
Since it is Sunday and I have nothing to do I have decided it is time to screw you over on this and make you shut up once and for all (and won't be apologizing this time HD). Man O' War broke many records with higher weights (often 15+lbs), and with his head in his chest often. He lost once because of a bad ride and faulty start by Mars Cassidy. He proved he was the best in his colts, making him a far better sire than Secretariat, almost up to that of Northern Dancer and Native Dancer. Man O' War was the favorite in ALL of his races and rarely gave weight to another horse, when he did it was not much. He beat Sir Barton who also held many records easily and was almost always under a hand ride. Man O' War's foals showed they had heart. There is no telling how fast he could have gone, and it is said Riddle was afraid to find out. Man O' War did NOT duck Exterminator really, Exterminator's connections just refused to agree on Riddle's terms. We know Secretariat's best, but never did we see Man O' War's - and don't ever forget that Riddle never paid more than 10k for a broodmare, only around 5k for Brushup. As others pointed out to you, every horse in the Kentucky Derby this year had Man O' War in his bloodline. None had Kelso, not all had Secretariat. Man O' War's relentless form could carry weight as if 10 pounds was no different from 120 pounds. He was picture perfect, and healthy through and through (I remember a word... laminitis?). You see, with other horses Dr.Fager or Buckpasser could beat them at a mile, Njinsky II could beat them at 2, Ruffian would demolish them at 10f - but with Man O' War NOBODY would beat him. Now they would come close, but no one would beat him. He was versatile, siring turf runners and jumpers, routers and sprinters. The horses who he beat were champions, legends who would have been like Exterminator and Sir Barton, but Man O' War never gave them the chance. Man O' War scared away competition, running against very few horses because of his surefire win. He almost had a walkover in the Lawrence Realization, but Hoodwink prevented it, who he beat by such a margin it would not be documented. He managed to take not 1/5 off the track record, but a good 4+ seconds! He was a freak, and to say he is anywhere near double digits in rankings makes you sound like a complete idiot. Thank you for reading evidence, now what is your opinion?
· 21 days ago ·
like
6
6
Mary Z.
·
Good job, cocoa, and much more polite than calling them a bore.
· 21 days ago ·
like
0
0
cocoa2
·
I have learned to be polite (sometimes), patience is still an issue.
· 21 days ago ·
like
2
2
buckpasser
·
Cocoa you are, like MOW, in a category all your own.
· 21 days ago ·
like
2
2
cocoa2
·
Buckpasser, hopefully on negative and positive aspects.
· 21 days ago ·
like
2
2
buckpasser
·
Definitely. Enjoyed your post immensely
· 21 days ago ·
like
1
1
cocoa2
·
SOrry, I meant to say he rarely took weight.
· 21 days ago ·
like
1
1
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
Love your point of view, cocoa. People need to stop saying he's not good. Just because he apparently "didn't beat anyone" he still beat the clock. And i think that was a very good essay!
· 20 days ago ·
like
3
3
cocoa2
·
If I was to turn that in I'd get a D+, it had plenty of evidence but REALLY lacked proper grammar and had lots of typos. However, thank you, hopefully people will quite doubting Red.
· 20 days ago ·
like
2
2
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
i think you have high hopes of people not doubting Big Red. We can always hope though. He beat the clock, but nobody seems to realize tht
· 20 days ago ·
like
3
3
airedale2008
·
Jackie: You’re right. Man o’ War is not the best horse of all time. That title likely belongs to Kincsem. The three American colts rated 1-2-3 by Blood-Horse and routinely by this website are Man o’ War, Secretariat and Citation. A fantastic trio of the best in U. S. history, headed by the horse you would rank 9 spots lower. World, American and track records mean something. It’s clear that this one is miles beyond just the best out of 1680 horses born in 1917.
· 19 days ago ·
like
0
0
jackie999
·
Kinscem is absolutely not even in the top 10 when it comes to all time best horses. How many horses were around when she raced? 100?
· 19 days ago ·
like
0
0
footlick
·
So tell us what champions came out of the largest foal crop, because obviously by your standards that horse would be the greatest. Foal crop size has nothing to do with greatness of a thoroughbred. Period.
· 19 days ago ·
like
3
3
Mary Z.
·
1986: Sunday Silence-in the TC, etc. Dane Hill-sire.
· 19 days ago ·
like
0
0
Mary Z.
·
now yous can debate using those facts
· 19 days ago ·
like
0
0
Mary Z.
·
http://www.jockeyclub.com/factbook/foalcrop-nabd.html
· 19 days ago ·
like
0
0
footlick
·
Mary Z.-those horses were not great because of the foal crop size. I want her to go to the year with the largest foal crop, find that year's Champion, and then prove to me that because of the size of the foal crop that year it makes him greater than Man O War who came form a much smaller foal crop. There is nothing to debate since the size of a foal crop has no bearing on whether a horse is great or not.
· 19 days ago ·
like
5
5
footlick
·
and as much as I like Sunday Silence, he was not close to being the racehorse that Man O War was.
· 19 days ago ·
like
4
4
buds
·
#1 Upset
· 19 days ago ·
like
0
0
airedale2008
·
jackie: It’s obvious that to you the amount of horses born in any given year is paramount. I would love to see your top 10 American thoroughbred list. It would have to be ranked precisely by the foal crop size, as extreme talent apparently has no bearing. Game? footlick and I are waiting.
· 19 days ago ·
like
2
2
jackie999
·
Foal size absolutey does have a lot to do with ranking great horses. A horse from a crop of 1,680 foals is always going to be suspect, especially when he really only raced his own age group, when you compare him to horses who came from 30,000+ foal crops and who raced year after year (thereby taking on the best of other crops as well).
· 19 days ago ·
like
0
0
jackie999
·
1) Secretariat 2) Spectacular Bid 3) Citation 4) Dr. Fager 5) Forego 6) Swaps 7) Native Dancer 8) Affirmed 9) Seattle Slew 10) Damascus 11) Round Table 12) Man O' War. I really don't think Man O' War would want any part of the 11 horses I ranked ahead of him. We might even toss Count Fleet, Buckpasser and Tom Fool in there as horses who might be just too much for Man O' War. We'll never know, though, because Man O' War never ran against a good horse, and that's because there weren't any horses around when he ran. Usually, he faced one or two opponents.
· 19 days ago ·
like
1
1
cocoa2
·
Please ignore troll's posts, that is how you shut them down (I would know). And since I couldn't resist, "This wiki ain't big enough for the two of us. Move on, troll."
· 18 days ago ·
like
1
1
cocoa2
·
I didn't know she didn't put Kelso in the top 10 list, forget not adding fuel to the flames, KILL 'ER! Jackie, where the hell do you come from? Fricking Mars? Man O'
· 18 days ago ·
like
2
2
cocoa2
·
War faced good sized fields, look at his MSW. After that the number of competitors quickly began to decline. Ever wonder why? HE WAS TOO FRICKING GOOD, IT WAS A RACE FOR SECOND. AND KELSO DESERVES TO BE PUT INFRONT OF BID, FAGER, SWAPS, CITATION AND AFFIRMED EVERY DAY.
· 18 days ago ·
like
3
3
jackie999
·
I thought I included Kelso! That moves everyone after Swaps down 1 spot. So Kelso is #7, Native Dancer becomes #8, and so on. Oh, and getting back to Man O' War, there were a lot of horses in his MSW? Good for him.
· 18 days ago ·
like
0
0
cocoa2
·
Sure, that's why you didn't include Kelso, who most of his records were *the same time as Man O' War's yet Man O' War was not fully extended.*
· 18 days ago ·
like
2
2
jackie999
·
I just included Kelso at #7. Try to stay with me.
· 18 days ago ·
like
0
0
jackie999
·
I just included Kelso at #7. Try to stay with me.
· 18 days ago ·
like
1
1
cocoa2
·
On what day could Dr.Fager beat him? Anything besides a mile and Dr.Fager is screwed.
· 18 days ago ·
like
2
2
Mary Z.
·
footy, I just gave the link to the Jockey Club foal crop site, and also gave the year, 1986, with the record, plus the top 3yo and HOTY that year. I'm not in this debate(I'd side w/MOW, prob, I'd have to spend time on that, but not really my thing--the history debates) Tomorrow, I'll start looking over the coming weekend stakes races and HP card. I already have a horse I'd like to get a win at GGF on Thursday, this year. Have fun, using that info I dug up for yous guys.
· 18 days ago ·
like
0
0
footlick
·
Mary z.- this will not be a debate. Jackie999 is not interested in intelligent comments. She is interested in arguing and getting attention. Foal crop size has nothing to do with greatness. Period. There has never been and will never be a correlation.
· 18 days ago ·
like
2
2
airedale2008
·
jackie: Everyone has their opinion. You do realize that Blood-Horse ranks Man o’ War #1. The racing community on this HRN site also gives him the #1 ranking. If I was to come along and give Man o’ War the 13th spot, I would have to consider myself completely out of touch.
· 18 days ago ·
like
1
1
jackie999
·
Foal crop size is important. Being the best of 1,680 foals is not even comparable to being the best of 40,000 foals, that's just common sense. Being the fastest kid at your high school, with a student body of 500 kids, and being the fastest kid in the world is two vastly different things. Besides, Man O' War was "setting records" at a time when there were no horses running, horse racing itself was young, and all his records were broken quite easily later on. Those two and three horse fields - the majority of races - don't count for much. And that win by 100 lengths, against one horse, tells me the other horse broke down or was dead tired and unable to compete.
· 18 days ago ·
like
0
0
morethanready111
·
Like lots of folklore, mythology, propaganda and nonsense that we just blindly accept, this Man O' War fixation that some of you have is worse than people who are crazed with their fascination with The Beatles. It's all played out, it's not as great as you think it is.
· 18 days ago ·
like
0
0
morethanready111
·
All of Man O' War's records were broken. It's true that the sport of horse racing was awfully young in this country when he ran. It makes a lot of sense to question how great he was, but it is still evident he was great, just not "the greatest."
· 18 days ago ·
like
1
1
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
cocoa, you make me laugh! And Man O' War broke records...doesnt that count for something?????? He was the best
· 18 days ago ·
like
2
2
cocoa2
·
No, not all of his records were broken, his record for 1 5/8 miles still stands, even Kelso could not break it. The horse Man O' War raced against WAS inferior, but he beat the track record by a good 6 seconds, doesn
· 18 days ago ·
like
2
2
cocoa2
·
't that say something? Man O' War is not folklore, that is your issue, you can't believe he was actually that fricking awesome. Your loss.
· 18 days ago ·
like
2
2
cocoa2
·
Jackie, foal crop does not matter when you beat the best of other crops.
· 18 days ago ·
like
1
1
Junebug719
·
Secretariat is # 1.. no doubt.. and I am not a TROLL.................
· 18 days ago ·
like
0
0
mikesek
·
MAN O' WAR's record for 1-5/8 miles was broken a long time. The record is 2:38-1/5 and it is held by SWAPS. The MAN O' WAR Mythology is a tad ridiculous, he's not the best horse of all time, but he probably does make the Top 10, which is quite an accomplishment.
· 18 days ago ·
like
0
0
Mary Z.
·
1&5/8 at Belmont. stat entry
· 18 days ago ·
like
0
0
Mary Z.
·
MOW is not mythology. There are guys who post here who had to have seen him run--live.
· 18 days ago ·
like
0
0
cocoa2
·
Mikesek, go to NYRA, then Belmont, and tell me who they say holds the 13f record? It is not Kelso who race twice at that distance.
· 18 days ago ·
like
3
3
buckpasser
·
Morethanready. Out of curiosity, you say that in MOWs day, racing was awfully young. What is your definition of young, the first thoroughbred imported to the USA was in 1730. Prior to the american revolution , Diomed came to this country with Messenger. Horse racing expanded into KY and other states after this period. So by the time MOW ran the thoroughbred had been here almost 200 yrs.
· 17 days ago ·
like
4
4
footlick
·
Thank you, Buckpasser. But now I have to wonder if they know who Diomed was........
· 17 days ago ·
like
4
4
cocoa2
·
It was Messenger, who started trotters?
· 17 days ago ·
like
3
3
mikesek
·
Here are The Facts of the matter. MAN O' WAR's record was 2:40-4/5. SWAPS, in the 1950's, ran a 2:38-1/5 at Hollywood Park in California. That's 2 seconds and 3/5 faster! KELSO ran a 2:40-4/5 at Belmont in 1960, tying MAN O' WAR's time. It was KELSO's only race of his entire career at 13 furlongs. By the way, 13 furlong races are hardly ever held, especially on dirt, and, from the looks of it, hardly ever were. Keep in mind that that although KELSO and MAN O' WAR ran the same time at Belmont, SWAPS' time beats them both by nearly 3 full seconds.
· 17 days ago ·
like
0
0
mikesek
·
Here are some of MAN O' WAR's best times: 5 furlongs in :59; 5-1/2 furlongs in 1:05-3/5; 6 furlongs in 1:11-1/5; 1 mile in 1:35-4/5; 1-1/16 miles in 1:44-4/5; 1-1/8miles in 1:49-1/5; 1-3/16 miles in 1:56-3/5; 1-1/4 miles in 2:01-4/5; 1-3/8 miles in 2:14-1/5; 1-1/2 miles in 2:28-4/5; 1-5/8 miles in 2:40-4/5. Yes, I know the tracks back then weren't as fast as they are today.
· 17 days ago ·
like
0
0
cocoa2
·
And then let's look at Swaps' career in the breeding shed.
· 17 days ago ·
like
3
3
Mary Z.
·
cocoa, those route times are very good, even by today's standards, with the better tracks, shoes, meds galore, less weight carried on average. I see 11 different distances listed there, with the sprints being faster nowadays. He set records at how many of those distances?
· 17 days ago ·
like
1
1
cocoa2
·
Mary, only 2 American horses compare to Man O' War, Sec. and Kelso (IMO). To put him that far back is suicide.
· 17 days ago ·
like
0
0
Mary Z.
·
All of his accomplishments were by age 3. Wouldn't he have had to carry astronomically high weights if run at 4?
· 17 days ago ·
like
1
1
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
troll alert??
· 17 days ago ·
like
1
1
buckpasser
·
Footlick. How true they probably don't. Cocoa. Yes Messenger founded the Standardbreds.
· 17 days ago ·
like
1
1
cocoa2
·
He would, Mary, and then we'd see some Dr.Fager action. Riddle however was looking at that $ from Man O' War's progeny.
· 17 days ago ·
like
0
0
Mikesek
·
Here's the Top 15: 1) SECRETARIAT 2) SPECTACULAR BID 3) CITATION 4) FOREGO 5) DR. FAGER 6) DAMASCUS 7) SWAPS 8) AFFIRMED 9) SEATTLE SLEW 10) ZENYATTA 11) NATIVE DANCER 12) MAN O' WAR 13) ROUND TABLE 14) KELSO 15) TOM FOOL
· 17 days ago ·
like
0
0
Mary Z.
·
cocoa, you can see why this will not end from that list. Do you want your record thread? Just question #10. #10 over ND, MOW, Round Table, Kelso, Tom Fool?
· 17 days ago ·
like
2
2
buckpasser
·
Kelso at number 14 for a 5 time HOY who won from 6 furlongs to 2 miles. Won on dirt and turf and Raced against an Arc winner
· 17 days ago ·
like
1
1
footlick
·
Mary Z.- back then the handicappers for the racetracks got together and sent a letter to Riddle telling him what the first weight impost wold have been for Man O War. It was going to be at least 140.
· 17 days ago ·
like
2
2
Mikesek
·
#14 is a super high ranking when you consider it is based on all the horses that ever ran in the United States. Not everyone can be #1. From what I understand, only one horse can be #1, and someone has to be #2, and #3, and so on. #14 is great. The Top 25 are super, super great, in fact.
· 17 days ago ·
like
0
0
footlick
·
Mary Z.- I will not even go there. But, the fact that Count Fleet isn't even mentioned, probably because he ran too long ago to "count", is interesting. But, in the end it is all just one person's opinion.
· 17 days ago ·
like
1
1
footlick
·
#14 is "super fly".........
· 17 days ago ·
like
0
0
footlick
·
I have to stop contributing to this. It just too much. Have fun, guys.
· 17 days ago ·
like
1
1
Mikesek
·
COUNT FLEET came in at #16. I only listed the Top 15.
· 17 days ago ·
like
0
0
buckpasser
·
I love Forego dearly but ahead of Kelso, not likely.
· 17 days ago ·
like
1
1
buckpasser
·
Only one horse can be no. 1? Really. I wasn't sure about that Mikesek, thank you so much for clearing that up for me.
· 17 days ago ·
like
0
0
Mikesek
·
Don't mention it. Glad to help. It just seems that some people aren't realizing that being #10 or #15 OF ALL TIME is quiet an accomplishment, and they act as if 10 horses should be #1...it just doesn't work though.
· 17 days ago ·
like
0
0
buckpasser
·
Out of curiosity Mike how many on your list did you actually see run? The only two on that list I didn't see race were MOW and Citation and I still think the list is wrong
· 17 days ago ·
like
1
1
buckpasser
·
As Footlick said this list is your opinion and that's it. I disagree and I saw all but two race in person
· 17 days ago ·
like
2
2
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
But you forgot one horse in the top 1...Man O' War. Duh. '
· 16 days ago ·
like
0
0
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
But you forgot one horse in the top 1...Man O' War. Duh.
· 16 days ago ·
like
0
0
Junebug719
·
In a perfect world, we could line up the all time top 15 greats and let them show who is best. To each his own.. We can debate forever. I would just love to see them alive again and racing.
· 16 days ago ·
like
0
0
cocoa2
·
It is crazy to think a race would prove anything... jockeys, distance, surface, track...
· 16 days ago ·
like
0
0
AmbitiousD
·
Yep, Cocoa. There is a reason MLB, NBA, and NHL use a series to decide who is champion. hard to do something like this with horse racing though, although back in the glory days, it seems like this almost what would happen
· 16 days ago ·
like
0
0
jackie999
·
It's crazy to think a race would prove anything? Then why have we been racing horses for hundreds of years? And why wouldn't a race prove anything? Are we leaving this all to your opinion and imagination as being all that matters? Well, other people have thoughts on the matter too.
· 16 days ago ·
like
0
0
cocoa2
·
Jackie, take your top 15 horses and tell me a fair distance that they all performed equally on, then a jockey they would all have, and then a track, plus weight.
· 16 days ago ·
like
0
0
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
I do believe if im not mistaken the troll has a point
· 15 days ago ·
like
0
0
shadowno
·
Jackie999 you dropped 5 rating on La Zanzara who would crush any current horse (male or female) running long on grass. Exactly how do you base your ratings. ? My bone of contention being if your going to bring up a golden age horse, give her the respect she deserves.
· 15 days ago ·
like
2
2
cocoa2
·
She has no point. Secretariat had no shot vs. Njinsky II or Buckpasser at two miles. Dr.Fager might have beaten Man O' War at a mile. And then who would ride them? Could Turcotte take Loftus? And what if we went to Santa Anita? And any dirt running is unfair to Round Table who was a monster on turf.
· 15 days ago ·
like
0
0
footlick
·
by all accounts, La Zanzara was an amazing horse.
· 15 days ago ·
like
0
0
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
exactly. The conditions of a race mean everything. I don't think there has ever been a horse to live that couldn't be beaten by any horse on any terms
· 15 days ago ·
like
1
1
Jackie999
·
I loved La Zanzara, I am going to go give her a good score, she deserved it!
· 10 days ago ·
like
1
1
TenLeagues
·
Mike, Zenyatta, of all the amazing fillies who have come and gone, is the one you pick to place in your top ten? And above Man O' War and Kelso at that? Zenyatta wouldn't have a snowball's chance in hell against any of those three horses. Zenyatta is a nice horse, but she doesn't belong in the top 15 of great racehorses.
· 6 days ago ·
like
0
0
TenLeagues
·
"any of those three horses" -- Meant to include Ruffian in that list with Man O' War and Kelso, but apparently forgot.
· 6 days ago ·
like
0
0
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
she'd be up there in the finish, but I'd say MOW first, Ruffian, Zenyatta then Kelso, if it wasn't a mile or the classic distance. And you forgot Secretariat ;)
· 6 days ago ·
like
0
0
cocoa2
·
Man O' War infront under a drive by 15 over Ruffian who nabs place over Kelso by a nose at the wire 12 lengths over Zenyatta
· 5 days ago ·
like
0
0
Man O' War
I think Man O' War is the greatest. We all have our opinions and facts and figures, but one thing Man O' War has is the fact people are still trying to dethrone him which goes to show he still has made a HUGH impact and fans of more recent horses are threatened. I know a lot of people talk about records, of course Man O' War set, equaled, track, world, american records probably more than any horse and I know Secretariat and others have too, but it's not just that. Someone brought up about Swaps, his 1 5/8th was faster than Secretariat, is Swaps better than Secretariat then? So, let's love them and have our favorites and stop arguing facts we can never really prove or rely on.
Posted by
CharleneWerden
·
15 days ago ·
like
0
0
·
Comment
Show All 8 Comments
icyhotboo
·
The author of the comment on Swaps conviently neglected to mention that up until the time Hollywood switched to synthetic is was 2-3 seconds faster than any track in the world except SA where it only enjoyed a 1 second advantage.Sure Swaps was good but he was no Man O' War.
· 15 days ago ·
like
2
2
jackie999
·
18,857 foals were born during 1910 through 1919, and Man O' War's year of birth saw only 1,680 foals. He didn't face older horses but once, and that was Sir Barton. Not a big deal. And Man O' War's "record setting" was done at a time when there were no horses around, as the statistcs show, and the sport of racing was in its infancy. He was a great horse, but his "legend" is surely exaggerated.
· 11 days ago ·
like
0
0
icyhotboo
·
He also wore iron shoes, raced on tracks laced with stones, no starting gate to get an accurrate time. Let's be fair here. How much do you think MOW's tack weighed as compared to todays horses?
· 11 days ago ·
like
3
3
icyhotboo
·
If you want to compare crop size to quality I guess it's just a matter of faith, maybe Jesus should have waited 2,000 years.
· 11 days ago ·
like
1
1
buckpasser
·
Jackie. You ever hear of WWi as to why so few horses were born in his year. From 1914 to 1917 horses were taken from homes etc. throughout Europe and the US. They didn't distinguish between tb and other horses for pulling cannons etc
· 11 days ago ·
like
1
1
icyhotboo
·
I shouldn't have made that comment but to have an intelligent discussion you have to bring something new to the table and all you do is hit us over the head with crop size.
· 11 days ago ·
like
1
1
Mary Z.
·
icy, you are one of the reasons why I don't fall asleep reading here--you turned out to be cool. Most of the time.
· 11 days ago ·
like
1
1
buckpasser
·
Thanks Icy. You always get to the heart of a discussion. You are right of course here with the same worn argument
· 11 days ago ·
like
1
1
Man O' War
I think it makes sense that if only 1,600 horses are around, and you have one that is outstanding, that the outstanding one is only the best of 1,600 horses. To imagine that he is something more, or that he is the "greatest of all time" is definitely getting carried away. It's like being the best 8 year old baseball player on your block...it doesn't make you the best 8 year old baseball player in the world.
Posted by
morethanready111
·
21 days ago ·
like
0
0
·
Comment
Show All 12 Comments
icyhotboo
·
It's Derby Day, take a break!!!!!!!!!
· 21 days ago ·
like
4
4
footlick
·
Absurd. The thoroughbred breed back then was purer than the one today. Tjhe bloodlines more potent. You could easily argue that Upset was a better thoroughbred than the modern thoroughbred. Man O War broke records by multiple seconds, not tenths of seconds or hundreths of seconds. There is so much more to it than foal crop size.
· 21 days ago ·
like
1
1
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
He beat the clock!!! Are you kidding me??? So if the best 8 yr old player on your block beat outt the best record for homeruns in the world minor league, would he still be only the best on the block?
· 20 days ago ·
like
0
0
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
crazy how ppl say Kelso was better....Only secretariat was maybe better. Kelso would be 4th in all time greats in my list. And no, he is NOT mythology, because he actually happened. Hes not a unicorn
· 17 days ago ·
like
0
0
cocoa2
·
TBDF, Kelso won at almost every distance, beat many very good horses and ran at many different tracks. He ran frequently and won the Jockey Club Gold Cup (imagine Breeder's Cup Classic + Dubai World Cup put together!!!) 5 TIMES. He was HOY against very good horses 5 times. Few horses can go that, and Kelso deserved it. What horse do you know that can go 2 miles and 5f, beating the best throughout it all? Buckpasser is the only other one I can think of.
· 17 days ago ·
like
0
0
Mary Z.
·
TBDF, Now, you're going to make one of the guys that comment here feel badly about not being able to load Mr. and Mrs. Unicorn onto the Ark, but they always say MOW was the greatest of the 20th. century, or as you said, some say tied with Secretariat.
· 17 days ago ·
like
0
0
buckpasser
·
TBDF. I believe Kelso was the greatest, certainly of all the ones saw. As Cocoa said he was HOY 5 times and won from 6 furlongs to two miles. More impressively, no matter what 3 yr old won the Derby etc. none of them were HOY with Kelso. And that list includes Carry Back and Northern Dancer. Kelso would probably been HOY in 1965 as he had already beaten Roman Brother, but was retired
· 17 days ago ·
like
0
0
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
Ya true thats why i put him at 3rd. well i meant to say fouth. 4th would actually go to Ruffian imho
· 16 days ago ·
like
0
0
cocoa2
·
Ruffian I feel is very overestimated. She was great, but #4 is something!
· 16 days ago ·
like
0
0
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
no i meant to say 3rd!! sorrry
· 16 days ago ·
like
0
0
Mary Z.
·
could not have seen her run
· 16 days ago ·
like
0
0
Mary Z.
·
#1 female
· 16 days ago ·
like
0
0
Man O' War
Here are The Facts of the matter. MAN O' WAR's record was 2:40-4/5. SWAPS, in the 1950's, ran a 2:38-1/5 at Hollywood Park in California. That's 2 seconds and 3/5 faster! KELSO ran a 2:40-4/5 at Belmont in 1960, tying MAN O' WAR's time. It was KELSO's only race of his entire career at 13 furlongs. By the way, 13 furlong races are hardly ever held, especially on dirt, and, from the looks of it, hardly ever were. Keep in mind that that although KELSO and MAN O' WAR ran the same time at Belmont, SWAPS' time beats them both by nearly 3 full seconds.
Posted by
mikesek
·
17 days ago ·
like
0
0
·
Comment
Show All 4 Comments
AmbitiousD
·
Did Secretariat gallop out 13f during his Belmont Stakes? Not trying to make a point or cause trouble, I'm actually asking. If so, what was his time for the 13f?
· 17 days ago ·
like
0
0
cocoa2
·
Not on purpose, no time recorded I do not think.
· 17 days ago ·
like
0
0
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
imagine if they did record a time what it would be
· 16 days ago ·
like
0
0
cocoa2
·
He constantly broke records in workouts as did Man O' War.
· 16 days ago ·
like
0
0
Man O' War
He should definitely be in the 10-12 range, as he was a great horse, but due to a lack of horses (1,680 born his year) and, therefore, a lack of competition, he's more than a little suspect. He's definitely not #1.
Posted by
jackie999
·
25 days ago ·
like
0
0
·
Comment
Show All 15 Comments
cocoa2
·
You've hit #1 on my shut up list, you used to be #10 - #12.
· 25 days ago ·
like
5
5
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
haha! Gotta luv that cocoa!
· 25 days ago ·
like
0
0
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
and to jackie: dont start this again. people are tired of this debate
· 25 days ago ·
like
2
2
HorseDynasty
·
Does jacie999, not have the option to post their opinion on why a certain horse may not be #1 to them? Just like others have the the option on if and how they respond to the comment?
· 25 days ago ·
like
1
1
Mary Z.
·
hey cocoa and tbdf, is the draw televised?
· 25 days ago ·
like
0
0
cocoa2
·
Yah, DRF Mary. When in doubt DRF, I'd say.
· 25 days ago ·
like
0
0
Floridaf
·
It's also being shown on NBCSports.
· 25 days ago ·
like
0
0
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
im saying i dont like the saying "he should DEFINITELY e in the 10-12 range". im all for opinions, but not like this.
· 24 days ago ·
like
0
0
HorseDynasty
·
I'm all for opinions/debates also, but not like "shut up list" Like I said, how one responds to a comment...............
· 24 days ago ·
like
1
1
cocoa2
·
HD, If you can tell me without out laughing or grinning that this post was not going to become a fight where even more people than one would get their heads bashed in, I might apologize, however I think we have exhausted this topic and this thread was only going to become a blood battle, which we have been lucky to avoid for a good bit.
· 24 days ago ·
like
0
0
HorseDynasty
·
cocoa2, I do not laugh or grin when making such comments. You made the first comment, which one could say was meant to entice an ugly thread rather than a perhaps "civilized" debate. Like I said, I am for debates, but how one chooses to respond and if they do is up to them. jackie999 stated an opinion without calling names etc. I see nothing warranting a nasty reply whether I agree with it or not. Most are focused on the Oaks/Derby anyway.
· 24 days ago ·
like
1
1
Mary Z.
·
Hey, cocoa, No kidding; it was the "definitely"( 's), definitely bound to set others on edge. Who's next? Do we question Babe Ruth or God? Besides, when it comes to dinosaur times, "Like anyone can even know that."--that was another quote for T.B.D.F.
· 24 days ago ·
like
0
0
cocoa2
·
Your points can't be argued with, I apologize for my ill considered comment. However anyone who ranks Man O' War from 10 - 12 is not someone I want to listen to.
· 23 days ago ·
like
4
4
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
I generally have some of the same opinions as cocoa, and I agree that this was just a debate in the making when posting that comment
· 23 days ago ·
like
0
0
yukichan
·
All 20 of this year's derby contenders trace back to Man O' War...
· 23 days ago ·
like
1
1
Man O' War
If people think that Man of War isn't in the top 10 for the best all time best horses, then your crazy,
Posted by
wcbguy1
·
23 days ago ·
like
3
3
·
Comment
Show All 1 Comments
cocoa2
·
Like.
· 23 days ago ·
like
0
0
Man o' War, Curlin, Diane Crump, Dubai World Cup - March 29th
Man o' War, who would go on to win 20 of his 21 career starts, was foaled at Nursery Stud in Lexingon, KY.
Read More
Posted
58 days ago ·
like
0
0
·
Comment
Show All 0 Comments
Man O' War
Looking at the list of greatest horses of all-time 2 things stand out. To reach the very top you have to DOMINATE at the ages of 2 and 3 and you have to win at least 2 out of 3 Triple Crown races.
Posted by
larooski
·
74 days ago ·
like
0
0
·
Comment
Show All 16 Comments
travel_vic
·
Seabiscuit was a late bloomer as was Stymie
· 74 days ago ·
like
0
0
travel_vic
·
Cougar II was another
· 74 days ago ·
like
0
0
travel_vic
·
Bayakoa another
· 74 days ago ·
like
0
0
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
which is what Man O' War did :)
· 74 days ago ·
like
0
0
cocoa2
·
Riva Ridge. Don't forget the stud conponment, no Gelding is ever going to be as famous as a stallion or mare.
· 73 days ago ·
like
0
0
buckpasser
·
As to geldings, I believe Kelso, Exterminator, Forego, and John Henry might disagree
· 73 days ago ·
like
0
0
cocoa2
·
buckpasser, I think Kelso could've kicked some butt and I think he is best but he will never be known as well as Secretariat, Slew or Man O' War.
· 73 days ago ·
like
0
0
buckpasser
·
True, but to people like myself who remember the 60s Kelso was the best and certainly when Forego led the parade for Secretariats Marlboro Cup, he got a standing ovation from crowd. These horses would be remembered by race goers , but you are right about the general public and to that I would of course add Seabiscuit
· 73 days ago ·
like
0
0
larooski
·
travel_vic, those are some great horses you mention but they aren't ranked as high as Secretariat, Man O'War, Citation, Seattle Slew, Affirmed or Spectacular Bid because they didn't do the 2 things I mentioned. The late-bloomers don't get as much respect as the ones who do well at 2 and 3 is the point I was trying to make.
· 73 days ago ·
like
0
0
travel_vic
·
Don't know how often I have talked with leaders of halls of fame: YOU simply cannot compare intergenerationally at least logically. Last year's flavor of the month will be higher ranked based upon the obvious inexperience of the voters
· 73 days ago ·
like
0
0
larooski
·
Secretariat, Man O'War, Citation, Seattle Slew, Affirmed and The Bid are last years flavor of the month? Inexperience voters? The Bid is the youngest of those 6 and he hasn't raced in 32 years!
· 73 days ago ·
like
0
0
travel_vic
·
Domino St Simon, Phalaris, Boston, American Eclipse, Sysonby, Equipoise etc......If they aren't there no one really looks for the quality that is there. Fashopn Pan Zareta, the list is endless....Out of sight out of any attempt at researcing befoe opening the mouth. All great things did not happen in the last 50 60 years
· 73 days ago ·
like
0
0
cocoa2
·
Nope, they didn't Travel_vic, but from the late 50s to the early 80s Horse racing had a huge golden age.
· 73 days ago ·
like
1
1
travel_vic
·
spare me you Johnny Come Lately TYRO analysis
· 73 days ago ·
like
0
0
larooski
·
I'm talking about those 6 being ranked ahead of horses like Kelso, Forego, Round Table and horses like that, not pre-modern day racing horses but you can't pass up an opportunity to enlighten us
· 73 days ago ·
like
0
0
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
And Funny Cide!!! Dont forget this gusty gelding!
· 73 days ago ·
like
0
0
Man O' War
Man O’ War - born just before midnight on March 29, 1917. Secretariat - born just past midnight on March 30, 1970. It’s fitting that the two thoroughbreds most hotly debated as the best ever in America were foaled mere minutes apart. They were both truly magnificent in their time.
Posted by
airedale2008
·
86 days ago ·
like
2
2
·
Comment
Show All 3 Comments
cocoa2
·
Both were chestnuts, although Man O' War was more red. Both had simillar markings. Both were 16.2hh. Man O' War was leggy and didn't fill out as much as Secretariat, though.
· 85 days ago ·
like
0
0
buckpasser
·
That is a very interesting fact.
· 85 days ago ·
like
1
1
travel_vic
·
Best standardbred, Some beach Somewhere and MOW has exactly the same lifetime record
· 85 days ago ·
like
2
2
Man O' War
Carried 130 as a 2 yr old...unbelievable!! Hope we have another one like him! Exterminator would've gave him a run for his money, but I think MOW would've pulled through and won. No wonder his connections stayed away from this beast! My art proffesor asked if he was any good...HA!
Posted by
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
89 days ago ·
like
0
0
·
Comment
Show All 13 Comments
cocoa2
·
Exterminator was a joke compared to him, how can a horse who lost to Sir Barton win against Man O' War who kicked Sir Barton's butt?
· 88 days ago ·
like
0
0
icyhotboo
·
Sir Barton was not at his best when he faced MOW. You can't figure horse racing, football, boxing, on the basis on this one beat that one that one beat this one so this can beat that one. It just doesn't work like that. Exterminator race record of 99/50/17/17 about 85% in the money for almost 100 races is phenominal not to mention his holding the record for stakes victories that will probably never be broken, 33. Not bad for a sack of bones.
· 88 days ago ·
like
0
0
icyhotboo
·
An example of what I stated can be found in the decade of the 1960s. I forget which way the triangle worked but each team was dominate over another on a regular basis. I remember because I started gambling in 1959 at age 12. Yeah I even had a job working in the kitchen of a restraunt so I was careful how I spent my money of which there was precious little. Don't be to quick to jump to conclusions unless you know all the facts, your still young (wish I was your age) you'll see. Have a nice day cocoa.
· 88 days ago ·
like
0
0
cocoa2
·
Exterminator was a fantastic horse, but Man O' War was an amazing, awesome horse. The only horse who ever could have given Man O' War a run for his money would have been Kelso or Citation, the only horse to ever beat him fair Secretariat. Exterminator was a great horse, but he sure wasn't anything to Man O' War.
· 88 days ago ·
like
0
0
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
I can't say I agree. But Sir Barton did indeed beat Exterminator, but Upset also beat MOW. So in your way of thinking, would Exterminator lose to Upset because he beat MOW? Probably not. And Upset had to run a pheonominal time (for horses in that generation) to beat this Champion. Thanks for commenting and sharing your ideas. Have a nice week!
· 88 days ago ·
like
0
0
travel_vic
·
Tampa Bay person: a horse wins a race, in overcoming the SUM TOTAL of pace pressures from all the entrants so to day one horse beats another coming from a race of several does NOT mean there is a single influence coming from that race.
· 88 days ago ·
like
0
0
cocoa2
·
Sir Barton beat Exterminator and he beat him fairly. Both broke well, Exterminator just wasn't having a good day. Notice Man O' War beat Sir Barton with his head in his chest? Exterminator would have been the best horse he faced, but no more difficult than John P. Grier.
· 88 days ago ·
like
0
0
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
ALL I am saying is that i think he would've faced any horse of his time and still won. Geez, that all I'm trying to get across.
· 87 days ago ·
like
0
0
cocoa2
·
And I'm trying to proce that Exterminator would have been another easy beat.
· 87 days ago ·
like
0
0
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
I agree that he would've. Like any other horse of his generation.
· 86 days ago ·
like
0
0
travel_vic
·
speed just about always beats stamina unless we are talking 1 5.8ths and above
· 86 days ago ·
like
0
0
travel_vic
·
Do you realize how much weight ALL horses carry in the AM under exercise riders? Often 140 to 160 easily
· 86 days ago ·
like
0
0
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
I do realize that, but in the morning they do not go full out against other horses. And many horses get more competitive around other horses, so therefore they dont give their all in moring works. But MOW had speed AND stamina. He won a 13 furlong race in amazing time, sprinting away from only one other horse, Hoodwink. And he won the match race with S. Barton by 15 legnths with his head in his chest, but yet the race was 1 1/4 miles. Many horses could not beat another horse no mattter how good, by 15 with their head in their chest.
· 86 days ago ·
like
0
0
Man O' War
Also--he won according top all accounts with tremendous ease.:) Under a strong pull.
Posted by
sczen
·
89 days ago ·
like
2
2
·
Comment
Show All 1 Comments
travel_vic
·
Only JOhn P. Grier gave him competition. Exterminator would have been a true test at a distance of ground. His connections stayed away from him.
· 89 days ago ·
like
0
0
Man O' War
Remember--track times--as many track 'supers' have told me an allowance of no less than 2-3 seconds/mile would have to be lessened...from 1920 'til now...also--Man O' War ran on steel shoes--quite the difference than from now or even back to Citation's time when even he engaged in aluminum. Also-makes quite the difference in timing-as would the track itself. His only lo9ss-as Willie Knapp had stated years later--who rode Upset in route to his win over 'Big Red'--nowadays what they did would be illegal and they would've been suspended. Heeven admitted to boxing him in w/ the others-also-Knapp stated Man O' War was back and literally sideways when the barrier was sprung-that he went by them AS IF THEY WERE STANDING STILL. The greatest ever? Maybe one from the 1800's or earlier may have been---no way of knowing--but i believe he certainly was in the 20th century.
Posted by
sczen
·
89 days ago ·
like
0
0
·
Comment
Show All 0 Comments
Man O' War
Man O’ War may not have been the best of all time, but then, who was? That’s what opinions are all about. I’m not sure I believe all the hype generated over the years for this colt. What I do believe is that a record of 20 wins with one second, 3 world records, 2 American records and 3 track records (one still standing at Belmont Park) separates this one from almost all of the rest. Man O’ War belongs with the greats like Secretariat, Citation, Dr. Fager, Native Dancer, and Kelso. This list, of course, is bound to start those opinions flying once again.
Posted by
airedale2008
·
105 days ago ·
like
1
1
·
Comment
Show All 16 Comments
travel_vic
·
One could argue JUST AS LOGICALLY for Flying Childers, Eclipse, Ribot, the three time winner of the Melbourne CUp or Ormonde and a load of others. You cannot compare horses of differnet times.....MOW was the best of a foal crop of barely 2000 in a time when racing was severely limited due to blackouts from the moralists after WWI...For his time he was king,...leave it at that
· 105 days ago ·
like
0
0
travel_vic
·
many who saw both Big Red'w were split 50:50 and many of those who saw Phar lap ranked him higher than the both of them
· 105 days ago ·
like
0
0
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
Ok, to tell the truth, I am getting very tired of people dissing this horse. This horse had raw talent, no avoiding that. this horse had speed, stamina. Definatly the best in the world at his time, no way around it.
· 105 days ago ·
like
0
0
footlick
·
TampaBayDowns- you will never win tis arguement. Man O War was exceptional for any era, no matter what anbody says. No horse does what he did in any era without being one of the greats. He bested a stakes record by 6 full seconds. He carried weights as a two year old that no other horse had carried as many times as he had. People love to play Devil's Advocate here, but They all know that Man O War compares equally to any horse that ever ran. They just don't like to admit it.
· 104 days ago ·
like
2
2
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
I admit what I think is true, and I think that this horse was the best in the world at his time. With the advances in technology since then, you can not knowingly say that any horse would've surely beat him.
· 104 days ago ·
like
0
0
cocoa2
·
The only reason any of Man O' Wars records still stand is Belmont stopped running them. I think Man O' War was one of the best 2s to walk the planet, however at 3 I don't know.
· 96 days ago ·
like
0
0
icyhotboo
·
When looking at three three reds if they had retired Citation at end of 3yo season instead of bringing him back as a 5yo who never really recovered from the injury that forced him to miss his 4yo campaign would we honestly be having this conversation about who was the best of the reds?
· 96 days ago ·
like
0
0
travel_vic
·
Only a single distance was witheld as a honor to his memory
· 96 days ago ·
like
0
0
travel_vic
·
Wright wanted Cy to be the first equine millionaire but he never really cam back from the bow
· 96 days ago ·
like
0
0
Lexus473
·
Man O' War may not have been the best of all time...but he was the best of his time.
· 96 days ago ·
like
1
1
zxswordxz
·
I think travel_vic first comments sums it up best.
· 96 days ago ·
like
0
0
airedale2008
·
cocoa2: Belmont Park changed the Lawrence Realization Stakes from 1 5/8 miles to 1 ½ miles in 1970. This is the race where Man O’ War reportedly defeated Hoodwink by 100 lengths. He obviously was not pressed by the field, and still shattered the world record by 1 3/5 seconds. A lot of good horses and jockeys ran this race at 1 5/8 miles for 49 years and never beat the time. I believe in giving a horse credit when credit is due. This record is one of those times.
· 95 days ago ·
like
0
0
travel_vic
·
running against Hoodwink was a last minute ploy to save forfeiting the purse After the only other competitor Sea Mint scratched, Sarah Jeffords offered Hoodwink who had raced 6 furlongs 24 hours ealier, as the sacrafical lamb to keep it from a walkover
· 95 days ago ·
like
0
0
buckpasser
·
Just for the record, many two yr olds in MOWs day carried over 130. He may have carried that weight more times than other horses, but putting weight on 2 yr olds was not uncommon . It does not mean that MOW was any less great, it just puts his achievements in perspective. He was a great horse in his time and certainly for all time as how many other horses who raced in his era are as well known to argue about.
· 95 days ago ·
like
0
0
cocoa2
·
@airedale2008; Belmont Park also has stopped running 1 5/8 mile races. BTW, Man O' War best the record by something closer to 4 seconds, not 1 3/5s.
· 95 days ago ·
like
0
0
travel_vic
·
It is interesing to recoun the delicate condition maintained by MOW at his death and rhe requirment of covering him up in his casket
· 95 days ago ·
like
0
0
Man O' War
Several peopl who saw both Big Reds, including Charles Hatton of the DRF and HOF trainer Holly Hughes BOTH thought that the latter was superior but then John Vietch was of thepoosite opinion. Whittiingham though Phar Lap ws better than both of these
Posted by
travel_vic
·
96 days ago ·
like
1
1
·
Comment
Show All 0 Comments
Man O' War
I think he is one of the all time greats. He won 20 races, and lost the 1 because of a bad ride by Loftus. if people say I 'm wrong, look at it this way: You call Zenyatta great, and she won 19 of 20 with one loss by a nose. Man O' War on the other hand, won 20 out of 21 and lost one by a nose, and won by many more legnths, yet you do not call him great. Why?
Posted by
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
108 days ago ·
like
1
1
·
Comment
Show All 18 Comments
travel_vic
·
Have you read the chart? the description of the race? the substitute starter called out of retirement of the day who let the field get away when MOW was turned sideways?? READ before you hold the jockey responsible
· 107 days ago ·
like
0
0
travel_vic
·
Zenyatta, by all stadards of racing, with that late late style, SHOULD NOT BE. That is why she is unparalled in all of racing. NO late mover like that in history did what she did.NONE of them
· 107 days ago ·
like
1
1
footlick
·
All accounts that have read from that day said that his ride was horrible. Because of the break he could have easily kept him in the clear and seemed to deliberately put him in a position where he could not get clear and was blocked. Many columnists couldn't understand it. Also, some have said that the jock had Man O War moving the wrong way instead of being sideways or turned around, so when the break happened he was backing up. Just an alternate opinion. Either way, the horse should not have lost. But many in that era thought if he had been placed in the clear in the race he would have won with no problem. It was a mystery that to this day has not ever been answered.
· 107 days ago ·
like
1
1
travel_vic
·
Exactly the same record as the best pacer of recent years, Some Beach Somewhere and the best trotter of recent years Muscle Hill
· 107 days ago ·
like
0
0
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
I disagree. I think the best pacer was Dan Patch. And almost alll acounts of Man O' War's loss say his ride was bad.And I am not blaming the jockey: his is one of my favorities. Just because he had a bad ride doesn't mean I blame him.
· 107 days ago ·
like
0
0
icyhotboo
·
You obviously never saw SomeBeachSomewhere run. In his one loss it took the other horse's best effort (breaking the world record) to beat him by a head.
· 107 days ago ·
like
0
0
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
Wow thats cool. I like Dan Patch because he made my state famous. He also broke records, and his story is amazing. He was born crippled, and he was going to be destroyed but his owner took him in. He started out as a cart horse in the local town, then after winning a local speed dual, his owner decided to start racing him in fairs. Eventually, he worked his way to fame
· 107 days ago ·
like
0
0
icyhotboo
·
Dan Patch was to Standardbred racing as Man O' War was to thoroughbred racing. Their only competition being the clock, they were that good.
· 106 days ago ·
like
0
0
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
Exactly! The clock had nothing on them!
· 106 days ago ·
like
0
0
shores
·
If you like Dan Patch, you should read the bokk "Crazy Good" by Charles Leerhsen. I read it recently, and it was a great book.
· 106 days ago ·
like
0
0
cocoa2
·
I much prefer Greyhound as pacers go.
· 105 days ago ·
like
0
0
travel_vic
·
Greyhound was a trotter. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greyhound_%28horse%29
· 105 days ago ·
like
0
0
footlick
·
trotters... Roquepine and Une de Mai. Two of my favorites
· 105 days ago ·
like
0
0
buckpasser
·
Roque pine and Une de Mai were great but my favorite trotters of the ones I saw are still Su Mac Lad and Nevele Pride. Greatest pacers I was privileged to see Bret Hanover, Cardigan Bay and Niatross and Rambling Willie
· 105 days ago ·
like
0
0
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
I've read that book, and youre right. It is a great book. I was honored to become friends with a renowned pacer and trotter trainer, and he invited me to become assist. trainer! Very nice looking horses. He had one in training by Muscle Massive, the winner of the Hambletonian. Very pretty. I love to see them pace and trot.
· 105 days ago ·
like
0
0
footlick
·
didn't Une de Mai beat Neville's Pride pressing him the whole way while wide? Just saying......
· 104 days ago ·
like
0
0
icyhotboo
·
@footlick, yes she did. After the race the driver of Une de Mai explained, "we couldn't match his speed so we had to test his stamina." 99% of all standardbred races are run at a one mile distance, this particular race the Roosevelte International Trot was contested at 1 1/4 miles meaning she was wide 5 turns on that half mile track. Nevele Pride was probably IMO the best trotter until Mac Lobell came along in the eighties. have a good day footlick
· 104 days ago ·
like
0
0
footlick
·
thanks icyhotboo. I do know that they run longer races in Europe than here, so our horses are at a disadvantage. And I do remember reading that Neville Pride's driver said everytime he tried to give him a breather, there she was ranging up. She and Roquepine were amazing animals. Une de Mai's finish against Fresh Yankee was amazing when she beat her also. But they are just favorites of mine. I don't have enough knowledge to really say who was the greatest trotter of all time, so for that I will defer to people who do.
· 104 days ago ·
like
0
0
Man O' War
What's he doing at #1? He is definitely not the best racehorse of all time. He's actually lucky to make the Top 10. I would rank him at #12. People who believe second hand stories and propaganda just blindly accept that he's "the greatest" without examining the matter.
Posted by
morethanready111
·
156 days ago ·
like
1
1
·
Comment
Show All 35 Comments
footlick
·
Carried 130lbs 6 times as a 2 yr old. Carried as much as 138lbs as a 3 yr old, giving as much as 32lbs to rivals. Set 3 World records, 2 American records and three track records. In the Belmont, he set an American record, beating Sir Barton's record by 3 seconds. In the Lawrence Realization, he ran virtually against the clock, winning by 100 lengths in world record time, over a hopelessly outclassed rival, besting the previous record by 6 seconds. These are facts, not propaganda. How you want to interpret these facts and where you place Man O War is your choice.
· 156 days ago ·
like
5
5
DeadHeat
·
This is kinda what I mean. You can think a horse is the best, I personally think MOW is easily top ten, based on your facts footlick. But if somebody wanted to argue that Colin, Native Dancer, Bid, or Secretariat was better I would have to respect their facts because the race never took place. Good lord I wish it could, if it did it would be an unbelievable race.
· 156 days ago ·
like
0
0
footlick
·
I do understand, DeadHeat. I personally believe we could probably go round and round with at least 20 horses, if not more. The "propaganda" and "blindly accept" part of morethanready111's post just struck me the wrong way. I'm glad we can move on from earlier confrontations and still discuss.
· 156 days ago ·
like
2
2
DeadHeat
·
foolick, things get said in the "heat" of things. Those who dwell will never move forward in life. I do disagree with the propaganda, honestly because that can be said for most horses. There will always be a generation that does not know exactly how the horses in the generation ahead of them performed. I make a point to know most of the stats and read up as much as possible, so I can get a gauge on them. However, my generation knows Curlin, Rachel, Zenaytta, Invasor, Bernardni, Barbaro, Zapper, HDG, St. Liam. However, most of what my generation has to go on is propaganda for the horses from the 70's and 80's. So, IMO, you'll get it wherever you go, it's up to the idividual to look up the actual stats.
· 156 days ago ·
like
0
0
icyhotboo
·
@footlick - "I personally believe we could probably go round and round with at least 20 horses, if not more." I second that!
· 156 days ago ·
like
0
0
travel_vic
·
An expert panel from the BllodHorse would disagree with your assessment
· 156 days ago ·
like
2
2
travel_vic
·
Talk to an Aussie and they would say Par Lap or Makybe Diva, Italians another , Hong Kong fans would differ from South Americans......RELATIVITY
· 156 days ago ·
like
0
0
brooklyn.steve
·
Considering that the only race he lost where he was Upset that the fix was in, he would have been unbeaten otherwise, he is one of if not the greatest Thoroughbred of all time. Only other horses you can make a case for are Colin, Fashion, and Native Diver.
· 156 days ago ·
like
2
2
travel_vic
·
of course you mean Native Dancer, as Diver was just a Californis phemon...the fix was NOT if you have read Dorothy Ours great book regaring his life...Now talk about a fix, Sysonby would have been undefeated if it had not been for his groom durgging his feed.
· 156 days ago ·
like
0
0
travel_vic
·
Colin was very lucky to go undefeated as he ran his last two races almost lame. In his final race, jockey Miller had to hold him together at the wre after losing a very large lead. He was subsequently sent to England where that same leg trouble ended his career.
· 156 days ago ·
like
1
1
travel_vic
·
Sysonby had the sting of his only loss being augmented in that he lost to a filly Artful
· 156 days ago ·
like
0
0
brooklyn.steve
·
Dancer not Diver yes, thank you. To early LOL. I will change what I said to " the accidentail head start" that Upset got, so I can be PC. Yes Sysonby got screwed big time, he is probably top 10 all time.
· 156 days ago ·
like
0
0
stevebiscuit
·
Thank you! I'm glad somebody gets it. Man O' War would have to be the most overrated racehorse of all time. He ran against nobodies in races that greatly favored his running style and ducked any real competition, most notably Exterminator. He might belong around number 30, but number 1 is nuts. He was great for the time period he was racing in, but today he'd be average.
· 155 days ago ·
like
0
0
stevebiscuit
·
I'd sooner say Zenyatta's the best of all time.
· 155 days ago ·
like
0
0
travel_vic
·
The first Big Red ran from point A to point B in times that lasted decades
· 154 days ago ·
like
3
3
amir16
·
man I have been a horse racing fans since the age of 2 and one thing I have learned is never compare horses that never faced each other. Maybe we should get rid of the whole systems of thoroughbred rankings. And as for man o war his picture tell a thousand words. I won't know who to put 1st among these five horses: secretariat, pharlap, man o war, nijinsky ll, mill reef. For a second line-up: native dancer, seabiscuit, kelso, citation, damascus
· 154 days ago ·
like
0
0
footlick
·
Thank You travel_vic.
· 154 days ago ·
like
0
0
travel_vic
·
Mile and 5/8ths is not the same on turf to dirt and vice versa..His greatness is shared by many a knowledged eye who were FIRST HAND OBSERVERS of his ability......Not eveything of quality happened in the lat few years
· 154 days ago ·
like
1
1
cocoa2
·
What a wacko. Man O' War was the best, and is still the best. He was such an amazing racehorse that very few horses dared race him. He could go at almost any distance and win. He was never allowed to hit full stride, and the only time he was allowed to get close to being fully extended he crushed the horse by more than 100 lengths.
· 138 days ago ·
like
3
3
travel_vic
·
followers of Ribot would give you a big argument on his being the best. An undefetead two time Arc winner?
· 138 days ago ·
like
1
1
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
MOW is the best to ever live. IMHO. People who say he is lucky to be in the top 10 or 20, then why did he win a race by 100 lengths and still being held back? Also, why did he only lose one race?! Explain that. And no, those are NOT second hand stories.
· 133 days ago ·
like
1
1
GregRiessland
·
lucky to hit the top 10? that is pure opinion. someone just doesn't like man o'war.
· 133 days ago ·
like
2
2
jackie999
·
So what if Man O' War won a race by 100 lengths? Did you know his only "competitor" in that 2 horse race was a horse that had won 1 race and was a 6 furlong horse who had run 1 day prior and was being asked to go 13 furlongs against Man O' War? That was not a race, it was a travesty. Man O' War was a great horse, indeed, and an even greater sire, but he's not even in the top 5 of all time, but maybe the top 10.
· 130 days ago ·
like
0
0
footlick
·
Man O War set a workd record in that race, by the way, besting the previous record by 6 seconds. Not 6 tenths, not one second or two, by 6 full seconds and this was done against the clock. Don't be impressed and call the race a travesty if you want. It was a brilliant tour de force for one of the most brilliant animals ever to run on an American racetrack. Period.
· 130 days ago ·
like
0
0
footlick
·
should have been world record
· 130 days ago ·
like
0
0
morethanready111
·
Man O' War is a great horse who just gets overrated by many people. Looks like the Man O' War fans are giving Secretariat low scores, bringing him from 9.36 to 9.27 in just a few days, in order to get Man O' War to #1. It's unfair. Obviously, Secretariat doesn't deserve anything less than a 10. Why not play the game both ways and maybe, in no time, both of these great horses will be somewhere in the 100-150 range. It's getting ridiculous...but turnabout is fair play, no?
· 125 days ago ·
like
1
1
travel_vic
·
Why does everything of real quality be REQUIRED to be in the last few years. IN HIS TIME, in a foal crop of only about 2000, he was a monstere. NO one would race him other than Hard Guy Bedwell trainer for Commander Ross (owner of the very good one Sir Barton). Exterminator was in his class but only at distances at or above 10 furlongs. His track records, against no pace pressure, were phenomenol.......You shoudl really have an informed opinion before showing what you do not know about this giant. The BloodHorse panel made up of expereineced turf writers, voted him number one...THAT should tell you something
· 124 days ago ·
like
1
1
horseface
·
Man O' War ranking #1 why not? he's #1 in my book!!!! and that's my opinion Jack...
· 123 days ago ·
like
1
1
horseface
·
Man O' War 1# why not? He's #1 in my book and that's my opinion JACK!!!!
· 123 days ago ·
like
1
1
travel_vic
·
prominant horsemen, THOSE WHO KNOW WHAT GREATNESS IS, who were there and had lots of years of comparitive experience to draw on, rated him hihgher than Colin Sysonby and of course Sir Barton. It is only those with very little historical perspective and very little bona fide expert evaluations at hand who want to knock this phenom. Granted the press does what it usually does and blows things out of proportion, but on the mere fact that his time records stood as long as they did on slow tracks and the fact that he was eased up in just about all of his runs tells you that those who saw him FIRST HAND, realized he was never tested other than his Dwyer where his fee came out from under him at the start.
· 123 days ago ·
like
0
0
travel_vic
·
I for one, give the panel at the BloodHorse credit for their evaluatoins of the best of the 20th century. William Nack, one of those judges, wanted one old crummodgeon disqualified as he made sure that MOW was number one, by ranking Secretariat something like 14th to insure he would be an unapproachable number one. After the results became available, Nack criticized the voting process as "skewered" because one of the seven voters had ranked Secretariat 14th, thus costing him the top slot. "That's an outrage," Nack told the New York Daily News. "You mean this one person thought Secretariat would finish last in a 14-horse race?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood-Horse_magazine_List_of_the_Top_100_U.S._Racehorses_of_the_20th_Century
· 123 days ago ·
like
0
0
zxswordxz
·
@travel_vic...I have to agree with Bill Nack on his point. Secretariat should be #1 because of his accomplishments, the era that he run in, and his competition in the triple crown races would have been a sure triple crown winner if it wasn't for Big Red.
· 123 days ago ·
like
0
0
zxswordxz
·
I agree with blood horse list with the one exception. Secretariat #1 and MOW#2.
· 123 days ago ·
like
0
0
TheSecondBigRed
·
I'd say he is a fantastic, exceptional animal..but to say he is the best is hard to determine, given how long ago he raced, compared to more recent champions.
· 122 days ago ·
like
0
0
cocoa2
·
I think Nack's point Secretariat would finish 14th in a race makes no sense. We all know that certain horses excelled at certain distances.
· 115 days ago ·
like
0
0
Man O' War
Man O'War will never be as good as Seabiscuit
Posted by
TraceyJandles
·
121 days ago ·
like
0
0
·
Comment
Show All 2 Comments
cocoa2
·
Stop watching Hollywood Movies and do some research.
· 121 days ago ·
like
2
2
travel_vic
·
at four, this monster would have to have carried 140 to start the year. Vosburgh suggested that starting point or he would be in walkover after walkover. That plus the fact he had injured is right foreleg twice, Riddle did the smart thing and retired him sound.
· 120 days ago ·
like
0
0
Man O' War
I think this horse was an amazing race horse, as fit as they come. (not saying indefinatly he was best but he was certainly one of the top 10)
Posted by
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
122 days ago ·
like
0
0
·
Comment
Show All 0 Comments
Man O' War
A great horse with both fact and legend.. This type of posting is what and why I usually stay off these type of boards. People not the horses make such ugly comments that it can turn a new fan against the whole thing.
Posted by
debfayebrown
·
124 days ago ·
like
3
3
·
Comment
Show All 0 Comments
Man O' War
Haters of Man O' War- just stop posting stupid things like "What's he doing at #!? He is definitely not the best racehorse of all time." Just stop. If you hate him, make a website and see how many people visit it. Don't post these stupid things here please.This horse is my favorite horse ever and I don't like to see people posting bad things about him. Thanks God bless.
Posted by
TampaBayDowns Fan
·
133 days ago ·
like
1
1
·
Comment
Show All 3 Comments
jackie999
·
While I love and respect Man O' War, and would probably place him in the #10-12 range of all time, I think he would want no part of Secretariat, Spectacular Bid, Dr. Fager, Damascus, Swaps, Citation, Forego or Zenyatta. That doesn't mean Man O' War isn't great, because he certainly is.
· 130 days ago ·
like
0
0
jackie999
·
While I love and respect Man O' War, and would probably place him in the #10-12 range of all time, I think he would want no part of Secretariat, Spectacular Bid, Dr. Fager, Damascus, Swaps, Citation, Forego or Zenyatta. That doesn't mean Man O' War isn't great, because he certainly is.
· 130 days ago ·
like
0
0
footlick
·
and just maybe they wouldn't want any part of Man O War either.
· 130 days ago ·
like
2
2
More Comments
It appears that HTML was included in your comment, please remove any HTML code.
Man O' War - Pedigree
[Edit]
Fair Play
Hastings
Spendthrift
Cinderella
Fairy Gold
Bend Or
Dame Masham
Mahubah
Rock Sand
Sainfoin
Roquebrune
Merry Token
Merry Hampton
Mizpah
Man O' War - Race Results & Past Performances
[Add Race Result]
[Add Horse]
Race Video
Date
Fin
Jockey
Tr
#
Dist.
Sf.
Race
$
Cnd
1st
2nd
3rd
Time
10/12/20
1st
C Kummer
KWP
4
1 1/4 m
D
Kenilworth Park Gold Cup
0
3+ M
Man O' War
Sir Barton
2:03.00
09/18/20
1st
C Kummer
HdG
5
1 1/16 m
D
Potomac
0
Man O' War
Wildair
Blazes
1:44.80
09/11/20
1st
C Kummer
Bel
4
1 1/2m
D
Jockey Club Gold Cup
0
Man O' War
Damask
2:28.80
09/04/20
1st
C Kummer
Bel
4
1 5/8 m
D
Lawrence Realization
0
Man O' War
Hoodwink
2:40.80
08/21/20
1st
A Schuttinger
Sar
4
1 1/4 m
D
Travers Stakes-G1
0
Man O' War
Upset
John P Grier
2:01.80
08/07/20
1st
E Sande
Sar
4
1 3/16 m
D
Miller
0
Man O' War
Donnacona
King Albert
1:56.60
07/10/20
1st
C Kummer
Aqu
4
1 1/8 m
D
Dwyer-G1
0
Man O' War
John P Grier
1:49.20
06/22/20
1st
C Kummer
Jam
4
1 mile
D
Stuyvesant
0
Man O' War
Yellow Hand
1:41.60
06/12/20
1st
C Kummer
Bel
4
1 3/8 m
D
Belmont Stakes
0
Man O' War
Donnacona
2:14.20
05/29/20
1st
C Kummer
Bel
4
1 mile
D
Withers -G3
0
Man O' War
Wildair
David Harum
1:35.80
05/18/20
1st
C Kummer
Pim
4
1 1/8 m
D
Preakness-G1
0
3 M
Man O' War
Upset
Wild Air
1:51.60
09/13/19
1st
J Loftus
Bel
3
6 f
D
Futurity
0
Man O' War
John P Grier
Dominique
1:11.60
08/30/19
1st
J Loftus
Sar
3
6 f
D
Hopeful
0
Man O' War
Cleopatra
Constancy
1:13.00
08/23/19
1st
J Loftus
Sar
3
6 f
D
Grand Union Hotel
0
2 M
Man O' War
Upset
Blazes
1:12.00
08/13/19
2nd
J Loftus
Sar
4
6 f
D
Sanford
0
Upset
Man O' War
Golden Broom
1:11.20
08/02/19
1st
J Loftus
Sar
3
6 f
D
United States Hotel
0
Man O' War
Upset
Homely
1:12.40
07/05/19
1st
J Loftus
Aqu
3
6 f
D
Tremont
0
2 M
Man O' War
Ralco
Ace of Aces
1:13.00
06/23/19
1st
J Loftus
Aqu
3
5 f
D
Hudson
0
Man O' War
Violet Tip
Shoal
1:01.60
06/21/19
1st
J Loftus
Jam
3
5 1/2 f
D
Youthful
0
Man O' War
On Watch
1:06.60
06/09/19
1st
J Loftus
Bel
4
5 1/2 f
D
Keene Memorial
0
Man O' War
On Watch
Anniversary
1:05.60
Page 1 of 2 (21 items)
[1]
2
Loading…
HorseRacingNation.com
Loading…
Loading…