Ride
Flying Paster
against other champions!

Flying Paster

1976 - Horse | Deceased

0 fans

0 favorites

[Edit]

Owner(s):

Bernard J. Ridder -

Trainer:

Gordon C. Campbell

Bred:

(USA) by [Add Data]

Pedigree:

Gummo - Procne by Acroterion

Rating:

7.97/10

Profile

Pedigree

Progeny

Siblings

Biography

News & Notes

Photos

Comments

Log

What the Nation is saying about Flying Paster...

Flying Paster

Whoever keeps voting this horse down has no clue whatsoever.

Posted by jackie999 · 37 days ago ·

· Comment

Show All 3 Comments
morethanready111 · He deserves to be in the top 200, definitely. There's no doubt about it, he was a fantastic horse. · 37 days ago ·

like

0

0
travel_vic · memory of the match race clouds this ones overall record · 36 days ago ·

like

0

0
footlick · very tough consistant horse. · 36 days ago ·

like

0

0

Spectacular Bid Stands Alone: A Moment in Time

The date was September 19, 1980. The United States was about to elect a former actor as the Commander-in-Chief, and in the world of thoroughbred horse racing; a truly remarkable season of racing would culminate in a most unlikely way. From the beginning of the racing year, Spectacular Bid did nothin...Read More

Posted 60 days ago ·

· Comment

Show All 28 Comments
AndyScoggin · 26 wins in 30 starts Wouldn't it be great to have a horse like that again! · 60 days ago ·

like

3

3
icyhotboo · He had a good year beating up on Flying Pastor but you can't seriously compare him favorably to Dr. Fager who raced against the like of Damascus. When did Spectacular Bid make his run on grass as did The"good doctor". Let's stay within the bounds of reason, he was a great horse yes but not in the class of a Dr. Fager. · 60 days ago ·

like

0

0
morethanready111 · Spectacular Bid was every bit as great as DR. FAGER, and probably even a tiny bit greater. Both horses had phenomenal 4 year old seasons, but Spectacular Bid's 2 and 3 year old seasons eclipsed Dr. Fager. They both achieved great things at 4, however. I don't find much to separate them, and think of both as Top 10, if not Top 5 material, of all time. Flying Paster won 12 stakes in his career and looked like a world-beater when The Bid wasn't around, so he was definitely a top class and top notch racehorse. Spectacular Bid was truly phenomenal! Unbelievable! · 60 days ago ·

like

0

0
travel_vic · Fager was a prodigy and one of the top 5 or 6 of the century. NO ONE, except maybe Ack Ack or Forego had the combination of surface/distance ability and weight carrying... · 59 days ago ·

like

0

0
travel_vic · and Fager's speed has to equal · 59 days ago ·

like

0

0
travel_vic · that should read NO equal · 59 days ago ·

like

0

0
travel_vic · did Bid excel on the grass? Did he carry huge weights? · 59 days ago ·

like

0

0
travel_vic · Fager usuallyt went UNDER 1:08 in many of his ROUTE peorformances. See anything today or for that matter historically who could run that fast that early and be around at the end? · 59 days ago ·

like

0

0
buckpasser · Kelso won from distances of 1 mile to 2 miles on grass and dirt and won carrying 130 or more 20 times and beat the top horses of his generation . He was nowhere near as fast as the great Dr. fager but certainly in a class all by himself and certainly better than Bid · 59 days ago ·

like

0

0
Mike in SB · The first time I went to the races I saw Bid win the Strub, I have been a racing fan ever since and have seen a lot of good horses but none better than Spectacular Bid. · 59 days ago ·

like

0

0
stevebiscuit · It's a shame that something like scaring away the competition garnered so much praise back in 1980, yet nowadays horses who do that only seem to be scorned. · 59 days ago ·

like

2

2
BrianZipse · It wasn't all praise back then, Steve, believe me. But the fact that it happened in the Woodward, which was even bigger pre-BC, speaks volumes of the respect held for Spectacular Bid. · 59 days ago ·

like

0

0
Floridaf · Very good point Steve. Even if it wasn't all praise back then, it was still more respectable then than it is now. · 59 days ago ·

like

0

0
travel_vic · Never did care for Bid, BUT has walkover time was hard to believe without a single bit of pace pressure. · 59 days ago ·

like

0

0
MikeSek · At the age of 2, DR. FAGER won 4 of 5 starts, was second in the Champagne Stakes, and won 2 stakes races. At age 2, SPECTACULAR BID won 7 of 9 races, and was named Champion of his division. At age 3, DR. FAGER won 7 of 9, while skipping the Triple Crown; while SPECTACULAR BID won 2 legs of the Triple Crown that year and won 10 of 12 starts. One can easily see that SPECTACUALR BID was a far better horse at 2 and 3. At age 4 DR. FAGER won 7 of 8 starts, while winning at Arlington in 1:32-1/5 for a mile (1:07-3/5 for 6 furlongs that day) around one turn. He also ran a 1:20-1/5 in the Vosburgh while carrying 139 pounds. These two races represent him at his best and fastest. DR. FAGER won 7 of 8 starts while carrying 130 pounds or more. SPECTACULAR BID won 9 of 9 at age 4, carrying 130+ pounds to victory 5 times (winning them all), and put on speed exhibitions of 7 furlongs in 1:20, 9 furlongs in 1:45-4/5, and 10 furlongs in 1:57-4/5. I'm going with SPECTACULAR BID all the way. · 59 days ago ·

like

3

3
icyhotboo · The nice thing about comparing horses even those that ran against one another is that it's all theoretical and an argument can be made for 20-30 horses at least. I always felt cheated that Secretariat didn't run as a 4yo as Riva Ridge had already saved the farm retiring him at 3yo was pure greed and started the gold rush that's killing horse racing today. · 59 days ago ·

like

1

1
stevebiscuit · travel_vic, what do you mean you "never did care for Bid"? Do you think he was overrated? I'm curious because when I think of The Bid I think "what's not to like". He was probably more deserving of a Triple Crown than any of the Triple Crown winners. The horse faced top competition, carrying ridiculous weight(by today's standards), and in track/world record time. Plus, he was versatile as heck. He could win in practically any scenario pace or trip-wise. He did this on a consistent basis and on top of all that, the ease with which he did it all puts a huge exclamation point on his career. Were you a Flying Paster fan? If so, I feel for you. I always felt bad for The Paster because imagine his place in history had The Bid never existed. IMO if you took 12 of the greatest horses in history and ran them in the Breeders Cup Classic The Bid would just about always win. He may not have been as good as Secretariat at 12 furlongs, but at 10 furlongs he was the greatest there ever was. · 59 days ago ·

like

3

3
buckpasser · Your last sentence says it all about what is killing horse racing icyhotboo. I could not agree more. · 59 days ago ·

like

0

0
shadowno · I can preface this with Seattle Slew is my all time favorite and IMO the benchmark for the modern racehorse as an undefeated Triple Crown winner and was the best 3YO ever. However, for quite a while I have believed Spectacular Bid was the best 4YO ever and without a doubt, the best I have seen in the flesh. Saw all his west coast races and was also a big, Flying Paster "fan" who was in his own way as good as or better than the vast majority most who have set foot on a racetrack, simply born the wrong year, yet forced Spectacular Bid to be great each and every time they met. I also feel he was done a great disservice by having Donald Pierce for a rider, but that is another rant. BTW this is not intended as any kind of slam at the great Secretariat whose place in history is well deserved. · 59 days ago ·

like

0

0
travel_vic · did not care for Gtover, one horse makes me a hall of famer Delp and the owners were real slobs new to raicing and newbies about all manner of race etiquette. I reacall after Affirned handed him his head (after thre moves whie Affirmed just kept cruisng0 they were screming for a match race. Barrera just laughed......Did not care for him does not mean I do not know all about him as he tired to bite me several times in the barns at Claiborne · 59 days ago ·

like

0

0
travel_vic · Agreed that Kelso had the multiple adaptation to short long, dirt turf and weight carrier.We will never see the likes of that kind of triple corwn again · 59 days ago ·

like

0

0
Buckpasser · To put Kelso's accomplishment in a different perspective no matter how good any three yr old was, or well they did in the triple crown races or after · 58 days ago ·

like

0

0
Buckpasser · Was horse of the year for 5 straight years. · 58 days ago ·

like

0

0
Buckpasser · That should've read no threeyr old regardless of triple crown performance was able threat horse of the year honors from Kelso for 5 yrs. that says alot about Kelso's dominance · 58 days ago ·

like

0

0
icyhotboo · Dr. Fager was named Horse of the Year, champion sprinter, champion grass horse and champion older male -- the only horse in history to capture all four honors. · 58 days ago ·

like

1

1
buckpasser · The Doctor was a once in a lifetime horse no question about it. My only point with Kelso was that he dominated the scene from 1960 to 1964 regardless of the exploits of any three yr old in the triple crown races or any other horse on grass or dirt · 58 days ago ·

like

0

0
icyhotboo · @buckpasser- Kelso was awsome!!! he ran on anything at any distance if someone were to say he was the best it would be hard to argue against him. Curious I never saw Kelso live but I did see almost all of the others and Buckpasser was the best looking of them all, not to mention one of the best and a personal favorite of mine. If Damscus and Dr. Fager had caught him in his prime when he wasn't worn down from years of injuries I think it would have been a rude awakening for both. · 58 days ago ·

like

1

1
buckpasser · @icyhotboo. Kelso was incredible in person and when he retired, it just wasn't Saturday at Belmont or Aqueduct without him. I loved Buckpasser, which is obvious, but I agree I think Damascus and the great Doctor Fager might well have gotten the shock of their lives running a fit and uninjured Buckpasser. I never thought he reached his potential due to his recurrent quarter cracks and other problems.. Richard Sone Reeves always said conformation-wise Buckpasser was close to the perfect horse. · 58 days ago ·

like

0

0

Flying Paster

It's so ridiculous that people voted this horse down so far. Just goes to show you how much some people know about horses. He was awesome.

Posted by MikeSek · 94 days ago ·

· Comment

Show All 0 Comments

Flying Paster

I made the intelligent choice to include this horse and get him on this website and have people vote for him. He deserves it. He was awesome. He was second to SPECTACULAR BID on many occasions, but that horse was one of the 3 best racehorses ever, so that's no disgrace. FLYING PASTER won the Norfolk Stk (Gr-2), Del Mar Futurity (Gr-2), California Breeders Champion Stk, Sunny Slope Stk (Gr-3), Balboa Stk, De Anza Stk, Hollywood Derby Stk (Gr-1), Santa Anita Derby Stk (Gr-1), San Vicente Stk (Gr-3), San Antonio Stk (Gr-1), San Carlos Hcp (Gr-2), San Pasqual Hcp (Gr-2), etc. He was a fantastic racehorse, and the only intelligent choice is to respect him and give him his due. His race record was 27 starts, 13 wins, 7 seconds, 2 thirds and earnings of $1,127,460.

Posted by MikeSek · 344 days ago ·

· Comment

Show All 20 Comments
icyhotboo · R U SERIOUS? · 344 days ago ·

like

0

0
MikeSek · Am I serious? About his great race record? Yes, it's a fact. He won all those races that I listed. He sure was a lot better than 75% of the horses listed in the Top 500 at the moment. He won 13 of 27, and was 2nd to SPECTACULAR BID on 4 occasions. This was one serious racehorse. He's certainly much better and way more accomplished than RUN DUSTY RUN or SHAM (though this one was certainly on his way to becoming quite good when he had to be retired...but he still only won 2 stakes in his life). · 344 days ago ·

like

0

0
icyhotboo · "He was awesome. He was second to SPECTACULAR BID on many occasions, but that horse was one of the 3 best racehorses ever, so that's no disgrace." Apologies Mike, I misintepreted what you said as I thought I read that you were stating Flying Paster was one of the 3 best racehorses ever.However I don't believe he was anywhere near the level of Sham who was a great one with just having the misfortune of coming along at the same time as Secretariat who has no equal where Spectacular Bid has many horses in history who could have run with him. · 344 days ago ·

like

0

0
icyhotboo · Flying Paster he was a very ordinary horse maybe he could be rated in the top 2,000 but even that's a stretch.Although he wasn't that bad for a grade 2 horse · 344 days ago ·

like

0

0
icyhotboo · "I made the intelligent choice" so then those of us who who don't make the choices you make are retarded? I'm a very ardent supporter of free speech but Mike your post's not only get more ridiculous with each one they strain my support of free speech.Sure you have the right to make them but your attack on such a great horse as Seattle Slew just makes you look ignorant.Cut us a little slack Mike and show the other members just a touch of respect.Were not as ignorant as you make us out to be. · 344 days ago ·

like

0

0
icyhotboo · Danzig- you rated this great horse a 7 and want to be taken seriously.What a joke. · 344 days ago ·

like

0

0
Jackie999 · One particular member is quite combative and insulting, isn't he? One post after another with nothing but personal attacks. That's sad. It should be banned, really. Flying Paster was an incredible horse, he was the dominant 2 year old and 3 year old out here in California. He would have been dominant at 4 as well if not for the presence of the top 10 all time great Spectacular Bid. Flying Paster won 12 stakes races and had a great racing record and you some of you people have the nerve to put him down and criticize someone for showing the horse the respect he deserves. Oh no you didn't!!! · 344 days ago ·

like

0

0
icyhotboo · "I made the intelligent choice" That is what I was responding to.Go ahead get me banned you seem to have a penchant for that.Since when is it personal to respond to a personal attack upon the intelligence of the body of members of this site. Just like his other post's "Uhhhh...hello? Another horse who defeated SEATTLE SLEW gets ignored by jealous 'Slew' fans? Come on...let's get with it folks!" · 343 days ago ·

like

0

0
icyhotboo · Some day both of you may come to the realization that some of the local horses can't hold their ground when they step out of the pond and venture into the lakes and oceans. · 343 days ago ·

like

0

0
Jackie999 · No, you're a bully, but like most bullies, you are unable to see that. No one was "attacking" all the members. You're the one in charge of that kind of stuff. · 343 days ago ·

like

0

0
icyhotboo · I never advocating barring someone who didn't think like me as you have repeatedly.I may strongly disagree with him but I am not asking for him or anyone else to be barred. · 343 days ago ·

like

0

0
Jackie999 · Personal attacks should be banned. This is a forum for horse racing, thoughts, opinions and ideas, it's not a forum for you to berate other people. · 343 days ago ·

like

0

0
shadowno · Flying Paster was a VERY nice horse. Competetive and game both short and long. He also was victim to some abysmal rides from Donald Pierce. Maybe not a Spectacular Bid, but a top flight race horse in any generation. · 343 days ago ·

like

0

0
icyhotboo · I believe calling for the banishment of people who don't share your opinion falls into the category of personal attacks!The last time you issued such a statement was TODAY and you post that.Even when issuing a positive statement like the one above the word "banned" can usually be found. · 343 days ago ·

like

0

0
Jackie999 · I have never seen anything like it. Oh my goodness. I will say it once again, though, "personal attacks should be banned." We're not here for that. We're here to talk about horse racing. · 343 days ago ·

like

0

0
icyhotboo · "icyhotboo · no different than "Run Dusty Run".they don't belong unless you start throwing out horses like "foolish pleasure' who's at #100 in bloodhorse.just like a race Mike you have to make some intelligent choices to get it right and that means they all can't come in the money. · 28 days ago- Jackie999 This post by Mike Sek was directly aimed at me from 28 days ago and that is why I responded.You might notice my reply was a bit stinging but well reserved since it was coming from someone who waited a month to get back at me for the alleged slight.A reply could have been given 28 days ago but he had in actuality no information on Flying Paster at that time and had to research it.If your going to put a horse out there as worthy of being rated highly I would think you should know something about it at the time you put it out there or some smart ass like me might come along and make a correction. Mike your silence is deafening. · 343 days ago ·

like

0

0
MikeSek · I know all about FLYING PASTER. I have been attending the races since 1972, when I was a kid (not a goat, a child). As for the drama, I'm not into it, and I didn't wait 28 days, or any time at all, I'm just not really interested in playing your game. Anyway, I surely did know that FLYING PASTER was a truly top class racehorse and that he had won a bunch of stakes races. All the best. Take care. It would be nice if we could all be nice to each other, I think. · 343 days ago ·

like

0

0
icyhotboo · "Uhhhh...hello? Another horse who defeated SEATTLE SLEW gets ignored by jealous 'Slew' fans? Come on...let's get with it folks!" · This glaring headline was posted by you 2 days ago,is this what you call nice?This site is about HORSES and if you and others want to talk horses in a civil manner then start doing it and you'll get civilized comments in return. · 342 days ago ·

like

0

0
jackie999 · Icyhotboo...It's evident that you like to argue, that you look for things to "offend" you, and you like causing problems. The only person around here giving anyone a hard time is you. · 336 days ago ·

like

0

0
icyhotboo · What happened? on the sixth day after my post you noticed me.Flattery wil get you everywhere :) · 335 days ago ·

like

0

0

Flying Paster

He was a fantastic horse who was quite unlucky to be born the same year as SPECTACULAR BID. He should be ranked in the Top 150, definitely.

Posted by MikeSek · 372 days ago ·

· Comment

Show All 1 Comments
icyhotboo · no different than "Run Dusty Run".they don't belong unless you start throwing out horses like "foolish pleasure' who's at #100 in bloodhorse.just like a race Mike you have to make some intelligent choices to get it right and that means they all can't come in the money. · 371 days ago ·

like

0

0

Spectacular Bid dominates in Preakness win

May 28, 1979 After waltzing off with the Preakness in near-record time, Spectacular Bid should have a real ball at Belmont, where a victory in that storied, grueling stakes will make him the third consecutive Triple Crown winnerRead More

Source: vault.sportsillustrated.cnn.com · Posted 1113 days ago ·

· Comment