Ticker
  •  Belle Gallantey shocks Princess of Sylmar in the Delaware Handicap!Posted 4 hours ago
  •  Finnegans Wake defeats Admiral Kitten by an eyelash in the Arlington 'Cap!Posted 4 hours ago
  • There will be a Pick Six carryover of $167,021 when racing resumes Friday at Los Alamitos.Posted 2 days ago
  • There will be a Pick Six carryover of $42,460 when racing resumes Thursday at Los Alamitos.Posted 3 days ago
  •  Assateague goes wire to wire in the Dr. James Penny Memorial!Posted 4 days ago
  •  Assateague goes wire to wire in the Dr. James Penny Memorial!Posted 4 days ago
  • Clearly Now breaks the 7f track record at Belmont - 1:19.96.Posted 7 days ago
  • There will be a Pick Six carryover of $28,880 when racing resumes July 4 at Los Al.Posted 8 days ago
  • 1-9 Frac Daddy upset by Sky Captain in the Dominion Day! Posted 11 days ago
  •  Size holds off Ria Antonia in the Iowa Oaks!Posted 13 days ago
HRN Original Blog:
Thoroughly Woodbine

OPINION: 'Contreras Crown' is a trivial pursuit

Yes. Yes. As we were reminded by a recent press advance previewing tomorrow’s $500,000 Breeders’ Stakes, jockey Luis Contreras is one lap of the E.P. Taylor Turf Course from guiding home the winner of all three jewels of the Triple Crown with two different horses.
It’s obvious why Woodbine Entertainment Group has promoted this event in this way. It’s to help make the Breeders’ sound less like a lucrative after-thought and more like, well, the Triple Crown race that it is.
At first glance, adding cohesion to the Breeders’ Stakes marketing mix in a year in which there is no Triple Crown threat is a wonderful thing. It would normally be a great opportunity if something happened (or could happen) that tied all three races together.
This is the PR equivalent to barking up the wrong tree. Any organization in any industry should be very careful when its spin doctoring efforts result in an attempt to pawn a mutt off as a pure-bred.  It’s taking a long leap of faith expecting the customer to make the reach.
History has shown time and time again the true publicity potential of the Breeders’. Guess what? It’s when a horse has won the first two legs of the Triple Crown, the Queen’s Plate and the Prince of Wales. Not when a jockey or a trainer or an owner has managed to win both with two different horses.
Whether it’s England, the United States, Canada or Korea, the concept of the Triple Crown is sacred. It’s one of the few brands that thoroughbred racing has at its disposal. It’s not to be messed with. It’s certainly not to be warped as a public relations experiment.
The damage may already be done. Even after an interview with award-winning journalist Bev Smith, Contreras made comments that suggest he thinks he’s riding for a sweep of the Triple Crown.
If he’s been brainwashed into saying that he thinks he is, how many people that hear those quotes or scan the sports headlines are going to think that a horse is trying to sweep the Triple Crown on Sunday? If it’s just one, this has all been an exercise in miscommunication that will only serve to tarnish the Triple Crown brand.
There’s a second pitfall that could come out of this sales approach.
Emphasizing the fact that Canada’s leading jockey Luis Contreras is attempting this trivial feat in Sunday’s concluding jewel of the Triple Crown also reintroduces a simple question that opens up a debate about the legitimacy of the entire Canadian stakes program.
So, the immediate question: “Why is he in such a strange position?” or alternatively, “If he won the Plate with one horse, how did he end up on a different horse?”
If you haven’t been under a rock for the past six weeks, then you know that it’s because the connections of the horse, with which he won the Queen’s Plate, snubbed Fort Erie, the Prince of Wales, the Canadian Triple Crown of Racing and the almighty Canadian dollar in favor of a chance to win a second prestigious Grade 1 at fabled Saratoga in the United States.
This individual, who shall remain nameless for the duration of the piece for fear of shining spotlight on a horse remaining in a barn this weekend and taking attention away from the 13 that are running in the Breeders’, including Pender Harbour, the mount Contreras picked up and deftly turned into a Canadian classic winner in Fort Erie’s Prince of Wales.
The problem is playing on the “Contreras Crown” footnote requires all sorts of explanation just to get to the surface of the story. A perfect example of the media being forced to take its eye off the ball is Friday’s Toronto Star brief, which required mentioning as many horses that are in Sunday’s race as are not.
The uniqueness of this ‘footnote’ is that it is so rare for a Queen’s Plate winning rider to be forced into a situation where he has to find a new mount for the Prince of Wales. This is because it’s rare that the Queen’s Plate winner doesn’t show up in the Prince of Wales. Generally, it’s a foregone conclusion, an unwritten rule amongst Canadian horsemen. The last time before this year that the Plate winner didn’t make it to Fort Erie was in the 1980s.
If it’s due to injury, it is understandable – an unfortunate part of the game. But when it’s planned, it’s a completely, avoidable tragedy, and a lost opportunity for the Canadian industry.
To truly tell the story of how Contreras is in a position to win all three Classics with two different horses, requires giving a fair amount of attention to the reasoning behind the Queen’s Plate winner’s absence from the balance of the Triple Crown, an event designed and developed over time to promote the sport and enrich the Canadian thoroughbred.
Attracting attention to this issue, risks exposing some serious questions like, “Isn’t a pair of $500,000 pots enough of an attraction to keep a horse from going South for something more prestigious?” or “Are we asking too much of Canadian owners to expect them to do the right thing, support Canadian racing and keep their stars in Canada when a significant prize is on the line?” or “What’s the point in a stakes system that lucratively rewards owners of Canadian-breds if they’ll ship out for a graded stakes?” or, most troubling, “Enough with history and protection, why don’t we open up the Triple Crown to American-breds?”  
Whether you applaud or criticize the decision, the Queen’s Plate winner’s absence from Fort Erie three weekends ago was bad news. It took a superstar appearance away from a racetrack that counts on an infusion of star power from Woodbine one time per year. This weekend, this bad news extends back to Woodbine, where there’s a strong case to be made that a Triple Crown title could have been on the line.
This would have provided a fantastic mid-way boost to the long season, just cause to loosen the purse strings on the marketing budget and bring in many of the fans from the Queen’s Plate for a glorious curtain call. More importantly, it would have been a generous reward to the nation’s horse racing fans who endure days, weeks and years of equine parity, normalcy and, at times, mediocrity for the rare shot to witness greatness.   
With that scenario out of the cards, for faithful Canadian racing fans, Sunday’s Breeders’ will probably be more about taking a shot at landing a five-figure Superfecta over the E.P. Taylor Turf Course than cheering Contreras in his quest to become the first jockey in 52 years to win the Plate, POW and Breeders’ with eight different legs underneath him – a trivial pursuit that doesn’t justify any association with the “Triple Crown” brand.

 

comments powered by Disqus

Older Comments about OPINION: 'Contreras Crown' is a trivial pursuit...

I will give Hippolytus another chance... and side against a Contreras Crown.

Categories

Meet Adam Hickman
I join the Horse Racing Nation team as a longtime fan and enthusiastic student of Canadian thoroughbred racing. With 22 years of race-watching and form-studying under my belt, I’m a graduate of an era that brought stars like With Approval, Izvestia, Dance Smartly and Peteski. I spent the better part of the 1990s as a casual fan, attending races on weekends. I had the privilege of being in the grandstand on one of the premiere days in Woodbine lore – the 1996 Breeders’ Cup, the one and only time the Stanley Cup of thoroughbred racing was held outside of the United States.
 
In 2000, about two years after graduating from Carleton University with a Journalism degree, I crossed the apron and joined the employee ranks at the Woodbine Entertainment Group, taking a position as a field camera operator that eventually led to an Associate Producer’s role in the Woodbine Broadcast Department. I developed and produced several regular segments that have aired over Woodbine’s simulcast network as well as on the national network broadcasts.  In 2005, I moved to the Woodbine Publicity Office to perform various media relations duties and write for WoodbineEntertainment.com.
 
If there’s a thread that defined my 11-year tenure during all three WEG positions, it’s that I engineered my contribution around bridging the information gap between fan and horse.  One such initiative came in 2010, when I endeavored to bring fans regular morning Woodbine workout coverage, shooting and uploading close to 500 videos over the season. While I have moved on from my communications coordinator position to pursue different freelance opportunities, my dedication to providing fans with relevant insight and unique information won’t ever cease to be a part of my ongoing adventures in horse racing.