on May 21, Zetterholm worked 4F at Belmont Park on Fast Dirt training in :49.16 b finishing 36/62.

on May 21, Liaison worked 6F at Santa Anita on Fast Dirt in 1:13.80 h finishing 1/3.

In your opinion, who is/was the most underrated (yet proven) racehorse of all time?

who do you think were the top horses in the 1990's?

on May 20, Know More worked 3F at Santa Anita on Fast Dirt in :36.60 h finishing 9/46. Know More returns to the races on May 23 at Betfair Hollywood Park (Allowance Optional Claiming $80,000 race 7) hes position # 1 in a field of 7 for 3YO going 6F.

on May 21, Sabercat worked 4F at Churchill Downs on Fast Dirt in :49.80 b finishing 1/3.

on May 21, Daddy Nose Best worked 5F at Churchill Downs on Fast Dirt in 1:02.00 b finishing 14/21.

For what it's worth: Going into the Preakness no horse had a lower top Beyer than Oxbow. Coming out, no horse has a Beyer as high Oxbow.

just wondering? where did all the loyal D.Wayne Lukas fans who trashed him prior to the triple crown series go to and hide.they made it seem as though he actually forgot how to train.as a friend of mine and a very classy trainer. J J Toner always tells me. "you would be amazed how top of the shelf horses make you such a better trainer "

Omaha is certainly a coveted horse. We regard him as a legend, a triple crown winner on par with the greats of the 1930s. Would it surprise you to learn that on July 10, 1935 DRF published an article titled "Omaha Best Of Bad Lot"? Maybe things haven't changed so much after all.

What about Dreaming of Julia? She should be considered as a viable Pletcher candidate along with Closing Hatches. Although Princess of Sylmar clearly ran the best under the circumstances at the start in the Oaks, it's hard to ignore that Julia was snuffed the worst out of all at the start but still produced a decent run.

on May 21, Kauai Katie worked 5F at Belmont Park on Fast Dirt training in 1:01.25 b finishing 12/23.

on May 21, Flat Out worked 4F at Saratoga on Fast Dirt training in :48.27 b finishing 1/17.

i just read on another site that pletcher may be pointing unlimited budget towards the belmont stakes.first let me say,todd will forget more about horse racing than i or all fans will ever learn.i get it,you have to be in it to win it.i could see when rachel ran in the preakness.she destroyed her competition.i could see when todd ran rags to riches.she defeated her competition.unlimited finished a weak 3rd in the oaks going a shorter distance.she did not dominate her competition.yes ,previously she did run very good.but the caliber was not as strong.it almost seems as though todd has so many 3 yo fillies coming up to a race,that he is trying to keep them apart at all costs.when you run a horse in a G1 stake.any horse,you are doing it with the confidence that you can win or at worst finish at least 3rd.that being the case,what is todd telling you about revolutionary ,overanalyze or any other colt he might point to the belmont.he is telling you that a filly who could not beat her own gender ,has just as good a shot at hitting the board as his top colts.personally,not to comforting.

on May 21, Calidoscopio worked 7F at Santa Anita on Fast Dirt in 1:30.80 h finishing 1/1.

In your opinion, who is the best racehorse to compete in the 1980's and why?

on May 21, Power Broker worked 4F at Churchill Downs on Good Turf in :51.80 b finishing 3/4.