Blind Luck has run from one coast to the other proving herself constantly against the best of the best. She has yet to finish worse than third and has wins from distances as short as four and a half furlongs to 10 furlongs. She had wins over Polytrack, Cushion Track, and Pro Ride while also winning at the most prestigious dirt tracks in the nation. Heck, the only thing she has yet to do is race males, other than that she had done it all in 2010.

This year however, she started off the year with three straight second place finishes that saw her left in the dust of a speedier rival. Those two races did have excuses as they were run over an extremely speed biased track and Blind Luck may have been slightly rusty after a two month freshening. However, she lost again in the Azeri with absolutely no excuse other than she was second best on that day. However, even after those losses she was still held in extremely high regard and many still tried to make a case for her as best in the nation. Here is where the double standard occurs, since if I do recall correctly, it was not so long ago that another spectacular filly started her season slowly after a grueling 3yr old campaign but was dismissed by many, even ridiculed.

Rachel Alexandra, one of the best fillies to ever set foot on an American main track, did it all in 2009. Nobody could possibly deny her greatness that is unless you were blind, crazy or a Zenyatta Zealot –just kidding.- She ran in six different states and over seven different tracks and could win over a dry or sloppy sloppy. She broke the stakes record in the Martha Washington and Mother Goose, scored by 19 lengths or more twice –both in grade ones-, and took on males an unprecedented three times in one season, and she never once lost. In her final race of the season she took on older males, just after beating her 3yr old male peers, and won in an all-out 9 furlong dash. In that race she became one of only three horses to lead at every call in a grade one route at Saratoga in the last four years and the only filly to take the Woodward Stakes. A little side note, no horse has won a grade one route there it since.

After that race her connections laid her off for seven months before they next raced her. In that race she was rushed to get ready, in order to try and make the Apple Blossom showdown with Zenyatta. The result was her being a short horse and noticeably rusty, as she was beaten half a length. In her next start, she was still far from her best and was forced to rate. She was beaten a head to Unrivalled Belle, who was that year’s Breeders Cup Ladies Classic winner. It was after these two losses she was ridiculed and said to have lost her edge, even after she won decisively in her next two starts.

My question is why the double standard? Why is Blind Luck allowed over three races to return to form, the normal curve it takes a horse to regain its form, and Rachel Alexandra who missed training and was off for seven months was ridiculed? Rachel in the season of 2010 lost by a total of, maybe, a length. Blind Luck has lost by several this year when her losing margins are totaled. Rachel won her two races by 13 lengths total and Blind Luck has won hers by less than a length. Yet, Blind Luck is a monster who should be in the running for division lead and Rachel was a nag?

Do not get me wrong, I love Blind Luck and think she is spectacular for the sport. She is a throwback and deserves her praise. What was not deserved is the ridicule Rachel Alexandra received. Why is it that the horse from the West is allowed so much leeway and the horse from the East is practically stoned? As far as I can tell, the West complaining about how biased we in the East Coast are, might as well be the pot calling the kettle black.